Gay People

[TinyWeeWee]

Don't bump topics =X Its okay, I'm not being mean or anything.



They actually need this to happen in some parts of Asia, no one take any offense.

The government can just pass laws to limit the number of babies in the household. China has already done this.

By the way, you can fertilize a sperm and an egg without having a man and a woman "do it".

[Inna]

its funny how people concern themselves that will never effect them

You gotta be kidding, right?

[Fuzomeo]

this was under google adds lol

anyways gays are ok as they dont touch me of my dick ( mabye suck it )
edit: yep that was definately gay... i wont touch myself

[doorshutter]

this was under google adds lol

anyways gays are ok as they dont touch me of my dick ( mabye suck it )
edit: yep that was definately gay... i wont touch myself

gourav jr. ahh..

[g36gunner]

You gotta be kidding, right?

kidding who kanna I am serious if a gay guy was coming after me i would kick him the balls other than that i will leave them alone it doesn't concern me on how they decide to live their life no matter how disturbing it sounds there have been gays ever since Ancient Rome so what are we to do about it

[ilovepie21]

i dont have a problem as long as they dont try to do some gay stuff on me

[Raster Burn]

dont necro =\ its fucking annoying

[Alen]

Wow, somebody actually put 'let them be'...

I am 100% sure like all of those ppl would hate to be next to a gay lol.

[tednugent]

Being gay is completely immoral and it is also the dumbest thing ever. If gay people ever stopped and thought about "gays" they would know that "gays" will never become popular. Why? Because gay people cannot reproduce, meaning if enough people eventually become gay then there will be no babies being born. overall, everything will lead to the destruction of humanity because everyone is gay. IF YOU CARE ABOUT THE HUMAN RACE OR YOU WANT THE HUMAN RACE TO THRIVE...YOU CANNOT BE GAY!

and yes i know i bumped an old thread but i had to get my mind out there.

1. Your scenario is impossible.

2. There would still be some gay women who would want to have kids and would get inseminated and have children just like a hetrosexual couple.

And for the record, no I have no problem with gay people.

[Toymaker]

I believe gay people should have the same rights as everyone else. BUT i do think it's 'wrong' . I also think gay is a curable illness becuase it's usually based on childhood abuse. There's not 1 proven case of natural-born gayness haha. Growing up chosing to be at an early age, if not based on that reason, could simply be the result of mutual molestation or pronography which twists reality in fact. Not that i have a problem with it either, haha.

So i don't have a problem with them. But in the USA they can STFU. Gay's have equal rights but NOT to marriage. Very simple: The consitution says 'man and woman' and where does the constitution get it's rules? from Religion. Fact we have to accept (Founding Fathers). Sodemy and Adultery are actually still illegal in every state.

It's un-natural, there is no law state or faith that allow it, and all it's given us is problems and disease. HIV, AIDS, MANY butt-enzymes cause disease.

AMERICA has a BIG choice: Actually care about our well-being as a nation and keep Gay Marriage illegal (While not ignoring their actual rights) OR Become a useless buerocracy all about polls and think we're doing good when wer're not.

- > So where do they get their right to marry? OPPINION. < - Yes i ranted a bit on the politics of being gay but i also stayed on topic before-hand. I figured i'd spice up the debate

[maiko]

if they dont act gay

[tednugent]

- > So where do they get their right to marry? OPPINION. < - Yes i ranted a bit on the politics of being gay but i also stayed on topic before-hand. I figured i'd spice up the debate

They're still humans, and citizens, who the fuck cares what gender their "partners" are, that's not a good enough reason to deny them marriage.

[Toymaker]

There are more reasons to deny it then allow it, however...

We can use Massachusettes for statistical reference.

1. Increased Divorce Rates
2. Lowered Children Grades Rates
3. Lessened Community Involvement Programs

We can use history and science...

1. Increased disease
2. Increased Death Rates
3. Increased innocent infections
4. Fact: Multiple STDs were spawned BECUASE of Homosexuality activity.

We can use the law...

1. They have no 'right' constitutionally or religiously and sodemy and adultery are listed illegal.

2. If Homosexuality is an illness, why should we bend to them but not everyone else?

Conclusion

Homosexual tolerance is an Oppinion the Majority vote of America will chose it's legality - as always.

[tednugent]

There are more reasons to deny it then allow it, however...

We can use Massachusettes for statistical reference.

1. Increased Divorce Rates
2. Lowered Children Grades Rates
3. Lessened Community Involvement Programs

We can use history and science...

1. Increased disease
2. Increased Death Rates
3. Increased innocent infections
4. Fact: Multiple STDs were spawned BECUASE of Homosexuality activity.

We can use the law...

1. They have no 'right' constitutionally or religiously and sodemy and adultery are listed illegal.

2. If Homosexuality is an illness, why should we bend to them but not everyone else?

Conclusion

Homosexual tolerance is an Oppinion the Majority vote of America will chose it's legality - as always.

Massachusets: 1. Divorcing gives a few more lawyers money, who the fuck cares? 2. Isn't nessicarily linked to the child's parents' sexuality, I'd like some hard proof, not just statistics from one state. 3. Where the fuck did you get this?

History: 1. That is their own problem and fault. 2. Assuming you're trying to link this to the diseases, once again, their own fault. Not a reason enough to bar them from marriage, not to mention homosexuality does not necessarily create disease. 3. prove it. 4. (The only "fact" you list?) These STDs only 'spawned' because of group activity, some people just get around, that's how that happens, in a marriage, you're not supposed to do this, why should this be a reason to keep them from being married?

Law: 1. Because Bush is a Christian and is afraid of homosexuality. 2. Prove it's an illness then retaliate.

Conclusion: Sexuality should not bar humans from rights that are guaranteed to everyone else.

[radnomguywfq3]

There are more reasons to deny it then allow it, however...

We can use Massachusettes for statistical reference.

1. Increased Divorce Rates
2. Lowered Children Grades Rates
3. Lessened Community Involvement Programs

We can use history and science...

1. Increased disease
2. Increased Death Rates
3. Increased innocent infections
4. Fact: Multiple STDs were spawned BECUASE of Homosexuality activity.

We can use the law...

1. They have no 'right' constitutionally or religiously and sodemy and adultery are listed illegal.

2. If Homosexuality is an illness, why should we bend to them but not everyone else?

Conclusion

Homosexual tolerance is an Oppinion the Majority vote of America will chose it's legality - as always.

I thought America fought for freedom, thats all I'm going to say.