[Release] PTC Method [ASM]

[DeadLinez]

PTC Method

By DeadLinez

1.

void NoFog(void)
{
        __asm
	{
		push "FogEnable 0"; 
		call 0x377ED910;
		add esp, 4;
	}
}

2.
Notice this one uses the ALT****C it does not matter.

void Chams(void)
{
        __asm
	{
		push "SkelModelStencil 1";
		call 0x46F670;
		add esp, 4;
	}
}

3. Using a On/Off System *bool*

void NoFog(bool ON)
{
       if(ON)
       {
          __asm
	{
		push "FogEnable 0"; 
		call 0x377ED910;
		add esp, 4;
	}else{  
        
        __asm
	{
		push "FogEnable 1"; 
		call 0x377ED910;
		add esp, 4;
	}
}
}

        __asm This Code Defines & runs The ASM Code
	{
		push "SkelModelStencil 1"; This Pushes the command through
		call 0x46F670; This calls the address, the LTClient
		add esp, 4; This stores a stack with a value of "4"
	}

[NOOBJr]

Very nice deadlinez might use this!

[DeadLinez]

rofl wtf 50% SuperBullets? lolz u r pro

[NOOBJr]

Well 50% done but im not really doing it. My uncle is. I know its weird!

[GodHack2]

why don't we just use the normal ptc method ?
what makes this so special ?

thanks anyways

[J]

It's much easier to just make a function that does this. Then pushing a command would be 1 line of code, rather than 9 lines.

But, I have to admit, it's pretty sexy.

[DeadLinez]

well i think it's more organized, and i just add a new header with al my hacks in it.

[NOOBJr]

Also this is good because then its an undected ptc! Awesome!

[J]

Also this is good because then its an undected ptc! Awesome!

That's what we thought with gellins PushToConsole()

D:

[NOOBJr]

That's what we thought with gellins PushToConsole()

D:

That's true i guess. But as of for now. This will be undetected for some time!

[DeadLinez]

ok ,i just rough coded a booled version for "ON/OFF"

[NOOBJr]

Very nice deadlinez.

[J]

ok the bool one is very sexy. I like how it's still easy to use, by calling one function instead of manually using inline asm over and over /

[DeadLinez]

ok the bool one is very sexy. I like how it's still easy to use, by calling one function instead of manually using inline asm over and over /

lol thanks, might be a missing bracket idk, just thought of it.

[J]

lol thanks, might be a missing bracket idk, just thought of it.

Well nicely done, it looks good.