Originally Posted by
Crytical
Arun, i typod and said your name, my last reply was too Ace, oopse :X
Anywho, for you though, i'll break this down into Consitutional fact and History Nomrality.
1. There is no specifics to the Presidential election, you are correct. The only withheld obstacle is that the Electoral College, Senators and Representatives of each State, chose the final winner. The primary popular vote weeds the candidates out. The final popular vote serves physical purpose besides a gesture. Although some states tried pushing to have their Electoral's follow suit with Popular Vote - but it's a federal matter and therefore will not hold.
1. That was my point about Cars, you don't just quit.
2. War has increased the economy in almost every war ever to be fought. This War is indeed a 'bad' one. But i simply argue the original purpose was worth it. The same President is now forming an Economic fix-up package in which directly benefits American's more then any president ever before. Example: World War II. Republicans tend to vote for War more becuase they're majority is in business (such as weapons, supplies, food, mechanics, technology) haha. They profit more from the Government, hire more people, pay more taxes, and grow influence.
3. The majority of soldiers don't want to back out like little panzies.
4. America took eleven years to stabalize our own government. Only differnce there is Brittain didn't hang around and Terrorize our progress like in Iraq. There is equal support iRaq is better now as there is it's worse.
And yes, the term 'Time Table' as accounted to Military Political Strategy is the plan to set a 'timed' withdrawl of all troops. Would be devestating as proven also by historical warfare.
And the credibility talk was to Ace, not you, he denied the constitutional document's fact i mentioned lol...wtf? However: If you too want to be personal about it, simply check Historical References, the Constitution, and wait out the Election to see my proof. It's straight foward FAQs, i said "I" to the parts that were my oppinion.
Besides, what does argueing have to do with credibility? I have actual examples of 'credit' i suppose as we all should to talk like that? We're all three making the same mistake, Argueing in Oppinionated threads. I look dumb 'cuz of spamming FAQs all the time and you two look like the most menstruel staff on MPGH. It's really our faults, not saying those things are true.