Quick Question..

[Apoc91]

I get what you guys are saying, and I want to learn new stuff once you do learn new stuff you feel good.
So that is why I try to be less of a leecher, and try to learn more about C++ language.

Your past hack releases are great and have the look of a good coder. Even though I have only seen screenshots

so people could be doing:

int hacks [] = {f1, f2, f3, f4, f5};

sorry if i am typing random shit.

If you're using C++ you can just use the 'bool' type:

#include "CAHacks.h"

.... // More code in your program

HRESULT WINAPI EndScene(LPDIRECT3DDEVICE9 pDevice)
{
    static bool bMenu = false; // a static variable holds it's state throughout
                                        // each invocation of the method.

    static int menu_length = sizeof(menus) / sizeof(menus[0]); // Calculate the number of menus in the menu array.

    if(GetAsyncKeyState(VK_INSERT) & 1)
        bMenu = !bMenu; // This will toggle bMenu, if it was true, now it's false
                                // and vice-versa.

    if(bMenu) // Is the menu open?
    {
        static int menu_selection = 0; // start at menu index 0
        // Yep...
        
        if(GetAsyncKeyState(VK_UP) & 1) // If the up-key is down then we're 
                                                      // decrementing the menu index.
            if(menu_selection > 0)
                menu_selection--;
        else if(GetAsyncKeyState(VK_DOWN) & 1) // If the up key isn't down, 
                                                                 // but the down key is, we're
                                                                 // incrementing the menu index
            if(menu_select < (menu_length - 1))
                menu_selection++;
        else if((GetAsyncKeyState(VK_LEFT) & 1) || (GetAsyncKeyState(VK_RIGHT) & 1))
                menus[menu_selection].bActivated = !menus[menu_selection].bActivated; // Toggle whether that hack is activated.
    }

    // Now just iterate through the menus turning off/on whatever is off/on
    char buf[1024]; // Use this buffer to send commands.
    for(int x = 0; x < menu_length; x++) 
    {
        CAHack cur = menus[x];

        if(cur.szConsoleCommand) == NULL) // If the command is null, just call the helper function and continue.
        {
            cur.lpfnHack(pDevice, cur.bActivated);
            continue; // Go on to the next element in our array.
        }

        sprintf_s(buf, 1024, "%s %s", cur.szConsoleCommand, cur.bActivated ?cur.szActivatedValue : cur.szDefaultValue);
        RunConsoleCommand(buf);
    }
}

The CAHack struct is defined as so:

typedef void (* Hack_T)(LPDIRECT3DDEVICE9 pDevice, bool activated);

// Prototypes:
void SuperBullets(LPDIRECT3DDEVICE9, bool);

struct CAHack
{
    const char* szDisplayName; // The name showed on the menu.
    const char* szConsoleCommand; // The console command, or NULL
    const char* szDefaultValue; // The value when the command is off.
    const char* szActivatedValue; // The value when the command is on.
    bool bActivated; // Is the hack activated?
    Hack_T lpfnHack; // If the szConsoleCommand is NULL, we call this function.
}

CAHack menus[] =
{
    { "Show FPS", "ShowFps", "0", "1", false, NULL }
    { "Super Bullets", NULL, NULL, NULL, false, &SuperBullets }
}

void SuperBullets(LPDIRECT3DDEVICE9 pDevice, bool activated)
{
    if(activated)
        Nop(SUPER_BULLETS_ADDR, "\x90\x90\x90", 3);
    else
        Nop(SUPER_BULLETS_ADDR, "\x0F\x94\xC0", 3);
}

Forgive me if some of that has errors, I typed it up in the quick reply haha, but you should get a general idea of a better way to do it.

NOTE: In no way am I saying this is the best way, nor am I saying I'm a great programmer. I'm just trying to shed some light to the part of the community that is left in the dark.

[DoubleDutch]

Because the values get detected easily.

[Apoc91]

Because the values get detected easily.

I'm a bit confused now, what does that have to do with bad programming?

[freedompeace]

I get what you guys are saying, and I want to learn new stuff once you do learn new stuff you feel good.
So that is why I try to be less of a leecher, and try to learn more about C++ language.

Your past hack releases are great and have the look of a good coder. Even though I have only seen screenshots

so people could be doing:

int hacks [] = {f1, f2, f3, f4, f5};

sorry if i am typing random shit.

"f1" is not an int. It would be more like

int hacks[10];
for (int i = 0; i < sizeof(hacks); i++)
hacks[i] = false;

Because the values get detected easily.

Nope, unfortunately you're wrong there. Boolean vales are in no may easier to detect than integer values, both alone or in arrays. <.<

(typed on mobile)

[whit]

Yeahs. There's a reason why my releases' source code is only available to people who meet my criteria x]

There's so much you can learn, don't you feel good when you gain a bit more knowledge?

People are missing out. Missing out badly.

And what is this criteria x you speak of ..?