[Question] What is the best? Menu tabs / checkboxes or normal?

[Alessandro10]

Use the player class and when health = 0 , use respawn address.



Good point.

then I'll try to class, more in the BR, not 2, 4 or 6 to activate / disable

[Apoc91]

My menu API allows for you to specify an argument of whether you want a checkbox/collapsable menu/clickable toggle/key toggle =)

BaseMenu menu("Combat Arms Hacks"); // This makes a menu with the title being Combat Arms Hacks
MenuFolder folder("Direct X", TOGGLE_MOUSE | TOGGLE_KEYBOARD); // This makes the menu expandable/collapsable and allows the user to toggle the folder via clicking or hitting the right/left keys.
MenuItem showFps("Show FPS", MENU_CHECKBOX, TOGGLE_MOUSE | TOGGLE_KEYBOARD, &MyShowFPSCallback); // This makes a MenuItem that has a checkbox to show whether it's toggled or not, and when it's clicked or the right/left key is pressed it'll call the MyShowFPSCallback with a bool stating whether it's on or off.

folder.AddMenu(showFps);
menu.AddMenu(folder);

I think it's pretty elegant for a menu API

[Departure]

I like the look of Menus some are really nice, But I do believe it defeats the purpose of a hack because if you get screened shot by a moderator of CA you get kicked, for that same reason im not a big fan of chams, while they are nice and does give you a huge advantage its pointless if you get screened...

Personally I use hot-keys and sound to indicate if the hack is on or off, Also I would like to see more hack developers using a hot-key to turn ALL hacks off, even if you guys have a menu I think you need a hot-key to turn them all off at once in case its needed and you need to hide your hacking activities..

to be honest I think the only hacks you need which also wont get you detect as easy is the no-recoil and no-reload, its just about impossible to detect these hacks from a screen shot but yet gives you a huge advantage....

[Alessandro10]

I loved the checkboxes, the more I work on the simple menu, with a beautiful box in d3d.

[whit]

I like the look of Menus some are really nice, But I do believe it defeats the purpose of a hack because if you get screened shot by a moderator of CA you get kicked, for that same reason im not a big fan of chams, while they are nice and does give you a huge advantage its pointless if you get screened...

Personally I use hot-keys and sound to indicate if the hack is on or off, Also I would like to see more hack developers using a hot-key to turn ALL hacks off, even if you guys have a menu I think you need a hot-key to turn them all off at once in case its needed and you need to hide your hacking activities..

to be honest I think the only hacks you need which also wont get you detect as easy is the no-recoil and no-reload, its just about impossible to detect these hacks from a screen shot but yet gives you a huge advantage....

Ive been telling people to add a panic key but no one listens..
it would be pretty easy with the combined base i release..
if( GetKeyState(Blah Blah) &1)
{
hack1 = 0;
hack2 = 0;
ect ect
}

[Alessandro10]

Ive been telling people to add a panic key but no one listens..
it would be pretty easy with the combined base i release..
if( GetKeyState(Blah Blah) &1)
{
hack1 = 0;
hack2 = 0;
ect ect
}

Now we need not panic key, with Game status + Working PTC .

[whit]

Now we need not panic key, with Game status + Working PTC .

Panic key is for turning in an enemgancy when someone thinks your hacking..
What the hell are you talking bout

[Alessandro10]

Panic key is for turning in an enemgancy when someone thinks your hacking..
What the hell are you talking bout

Still game status with no need to get off, more is always good to have.

Do not talk about Hell, I'm God!

[Apoc91]

Still game status with no need to get off, more is always good to have.

Do not talk about Hell, I'm God!

Heh, funny that neither exist

I never thought about a panic key in all honesty, but that does seem like something that's nice to have. I'll add it to my hack thanks for the suggestion =)

Ive been telling people to add a panic key but no one listens..
it would be pretty easy with the combined base i release..
if( GetKeyState(Blah Blah) &1)
{
hack1 = 0;
hack2 = 0;
ect ect
}

Would you be offended if someday I did a revamp on that base?

e.g. removing the use of integral types for booleans and actually using 'bool' and adding some spiffy extras?

[Nubzgetkillz]

Heh, funny that neither exist

I never thought about a panic key in all honesty, but that does seem like something that's nice to have. I'll add it to my hack thanks for the suggestion =)



Would you be offended if someday I did a revamp on that base?

e.g. removing the use of integral types for booleans and actually using 'bool' and adding some spiffy extras?

I bet he would be glad to see someone vamping up the base he vamped up

[freedompeace]

My menu API allows for you to specify an argument of whether you want a checkbox/collapsable menu/clickable toggle/key toggle =)

BaseMenu menu("Combat Arms Hacks"); // This makes a menu with the title being Combat Arms Hacks
MenuFolder folder("Direct X", TOGGLE_MOUSE | TOGGLE_KEYBOARD); // This makes the menu expandable/collapsable and allows the user to toggle the folder via clicking or hitting the right/left keys.
MenuItem showFps("Show FPS", MENU_CHECKBOX, TOGGLE_MOUSE | TOGGLE_KEYBOARD, &MyShowFPSCallback); // This makes a MenuItem that has a checkbox to show whether it's toggled or not, and when it's clicked or the right/left key is pressed it'll call the MyShowFPSCallback with a bool stating whether it's on or off.

folder.AddMenu(showFps);
menu.AddMenu(folder);

I think it's pretty elegant for a menu API

HI5 man ! Someone who thinks ! =D

I do almost the exact same thing, it's so extensible

Ive been telling people to add a panic key but no one listens..
it would be pretty easy with the combined base i release..
if( GetKeyState(Blah Blah) &1)
{
hack1 = 0;
hack2 = 0;
ect ect
}

Dictionaries are fairly fast, and with the speed of current code, you wouldn't see any impacts of using dictionaries for your hacks :L

hacks[OPK] = false;

You could then loop through your dictionary and turn them off without having to add a line everytime you add a new feature.

[Nubzgetkillz]

HI5 man ! Someone who thinks ! =D

I do almost the exact same thing, it's so extensible



Dictionaries are fairly fast, and with the speed of current code, you wouldn't see any impacts of using dictionaries for your hacks :L

hacks[OPK] = false;

You could then loop through your dictionary and turn them off without having to add a line everytime you add a new feature.

may i have ur msn?

[whit]

Heh, funny that neither exist

I never thought about a panic key in all honesty, but that does seem like something that's nice to have. I'll add it to my hack thanks for the suggestion =)



Would you be offended if someday I did a revamp on that base?

e.g. removing the use of integral types for booleans and actually using 'bool' and adding some spiffy extras?

No i dont care at all i hardly did any coding in it, i just combined two bases..

Oh i dont use that base btw..

Dictionaries are fairly fast, and with the speed of current code, you wouldn't see any impacts of using dictionaries for your hacks :L

hacks[OPK] = false;

You could then loop through your dictionary and turn them off without having to add a line everytime you add a new feature.

I wrote that off my head as something simply to get my piont across..I wouldnt dare do it that way..

[freedompeace]

may i have ur msn?

freedompeace.Game(remove-this)Killer@live.com.au

[whatup777]

impractical?

Causes the user to have to turn on hacks out of lobby or they gonna be going crazy trying to figure out cursor pos in a game. KeyBoard allows that not to happen. Also Checkboxes can only have a value of "On" or "off".