My logic is my proof. If you cannot disprove my logic, then your God does not exist. It's as simple as that.
Also, if you want to attempt to prove that God exists, thus making my whole stand on this issue false, you have to prove him with evidence or by disproving my logic. Good luck.
why can't you just agree to disagree instead of being a stuck up lil 12 year old douche
everyone has different views and one day you may feel like a complete idiot for posting the shit you posted
grow up n stop trying to make everyone else that doesn't see shit like you feel worse life rolls on n shit
You can quote me on this..when it comes to juggalos we're.....
More than a charm n a chain we're like a crackpipe
GOT SHIT TO SAY ABOUT THE JUGGALO FAMILY LISTEN TO THIS ONE SONG
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_n2kY...eature=related
I have no need to prove that God exists to you.
In the scriptures it says not to preach to people that are not ready to accept God's sovereign will.
Now,
your logic comes from you finding some kind of loophole in the text of a book that you don't even believe in.
So by you attempting to get your "proof" from a book that is supposedly nonsense in the first place just pretty much shoots down your so called logical argument.
Find me physical, irrefutable proof that God does not exist.
Until you do that, then you have not disproven God.
You've only found what may or may not be a flaw in the way a prophet may or may not have viewed God's supernatural virtues.
You could have at least been original btw.
This argument is all over every Atheist site out there.
The universe is governed by logic, things that are logically contradictory do not exist in our universe. If God is defined having contradictory properties then he cannot exist in this universe. Simple as that.
"We swallow greedily any lie that flatters us, but we sip only little by little at a truth we find bitter." ~ Denis Diderot
There are so many seemingly chaotic laws that cannot be explained by "logic" that I wouldn't claim that just yet.
Read what I said. Slowly this time. I never said faith didn't contribute to tradition, I just said tradition isn't faith (note: define:implication).
I'm Alen on Steam. RIP Skype Friday nights.
I'm Navi's lover 💖
Dave84311: God I've always wanted to eat crayons, with their vibrant colors. Only if they had taste.
Mr. Lonely: @Alen I like making you wet, it makes me hard.
For someone so eager to disprove my standpoint and prove that God doesn't not exist, you do like to make outrageous claims. I'm trying to figure out when anyone said you couldn't disprove something by using the logic that thing is based on; isn't that how you disprove ANYTHING?
You could have at least been original, btw. This religion is all over every polytheistic religion out there.
I'm Alen on Steam. RIP Skype Friday nights.
I'm Navi's lover 💖
Dave84311: God I've always wanted to eat crayons, with their vibrant colors. Only if they had taste.
Mr. Lonely: @Alen I like making you wet, it makes me hard.
Ok dude, I see where you're going with it..
but you're still not right..
Tradition:
The handing down of statements, beliefs, legends, customs, information, etc., from generation to generation, esp. by word of mouth or by practice: a story that has come down to us by popular tradition.
Belief is the foundation of faith. So how is it not tradition?
Kind of like how you claim to disprove God eh?
It's as Paroxysm said, if the universe is ruled by logic (supposedly)
Then why would God do something that goes against this logic?
The idea that the universe has an infinite past stretching back in time into infinity is both philosophically and scientifically problematic; all indications are that there is a point in time at which the universe began to exist. This beginning must either have been caused or uncaused. It cannot have been uncaused, though, for the idea of an uncaused event is absurd; nothing comes from nothing. The universe must therefore have been brought into existence by something outside it. The argument thus confirms one element of Judaism and Christianity.
Prove me otherwise. You really can't, just like I can't prove or disprove the Big-Bang theory
Consequently, I cannot prove the scenario presented above about a creator either.
Oh well.
Last edited by Ethereal; 02-01-2011 at 10:55 PM.
You can quote me on this..when it comes to juggalos we're.....
More than a charm n a chain we're like a crackpipe
GOT SHIT TO SAY ABOUT THE JUGGALO FAMILY LISTEN TO THIS ONE SONG
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_n2kY...eature=related
Argument of Ignorance won't help you win an argument. If you, once again, read the title, it says a disproof of YOUR God, not a disprove of a creator. You love to take things out of context, and when I tell you of such coincidences you get angry. Oh yeah, and a beginning before a beginning must exist with your God as well, or he can't exist within this universe, meaning he isn't omnipresent, once again disproving your God.
If I were to suggest that between the Earth and Mars there is a china teapot revolving about the sun in an elliptical orbit, nobody would be able to disprove my assertion provided I were careful to add that the teapot is too small to be revealed even by our most powerful telescopes. But if I were to go on to say that, since my assertion cannot be disproved, it is an intolerable presumption on the part of human reason to doubt it, I should rightly be thought to be talking nonsense. If, however, the existence of such a teapot were affirmed in ancient books, taught as the sacred truth every Sunday, and instilled into the minds of children at school, hesitation to believe in its existence would become a mark of eccentricity and entitle the doubter to the attentions of the psychiatrist in an enlightened age or of the Inquisitor in an earlier time. - Bertrand Russel
Last edited by barklolbark; 02-02-2011 at 01:11 AM.