Anti-Decompiler Version 1.0

[Bombsaway707]

Use this program to stop people from even seeing your source code

(Yes.. quality is on the suckish side, im uploading HD tomorrow)
VirusTotal - Free Online Virus, Malware and URL Scanner
Anti-Decompiler Version 1.0.rar MD5:ecd7e43a26c4ed4c9bba96da758c7862 - VirSCAN.org Scanners did not find malware!
Also i am aware this is not a hack i'm just trying to help out the CA hack makers, ill move it to programs in a day or so

[Bombsaway707]

No offense, but this wont help hack "makers" because it is for .net files.

it works for .dll files, doesn't matter what language their coded in

[CodeDemon]

it works for .dll files, doesn't matter what language their coded in

Based on your video, it looked like you were using it on .net files /. .net files have different map structures.

[flameswor10]

This is awesome

[NOOB]

I take it that this a generic scan time crypter?

[Bombsaway707]

Based on your video, it looked like you were using it on .net files /. .net files have different map structures.

you really think im going to make a video of all the different files it can crypt

I take it that this a generic scan time crypter?

Kinda, it injects junk code and messes with the number of headings. Doing no damage to the code at all but messing up decompilers

[Departure]

Well if it is proper Encryption of modules(Pe, Dll) and uses the same "encryption" methods for both .net and native there is no way this is possible unless you have 2 different Stubs and 2 different types .net and native, to encrypt the dll's is a feat of its own because you would first need to create a new section in the dll then copy the bytes from the code section encrypt them change the entry point to your decryption routine ect.. ect.. and thats just for native dll's. And you have achieved this in one program, WOW your should be getting hired very soon by big companies. Or the other thing you might have done is EOF and Resources which doesn't count as Encryptor. as the original code is still in tacked.

[Bombsaway707]

Well if it is proper Encryption of modules(Pe, Dll) and uses the same "encryption" methods for both .net and native there is no way this is possible unless you have 2 different Stubs and 2 different types .net and native, to encrypt the dll's is a feat of its own because you would first need to create a new section in the dll then copy the bytes from the code section encrypt them change the entry point to your decryption routine ect.. ect.. and thats just for native dll's. And you have achieved this in one program, WOW your should be getting hired very soon by big companies. Or the other thing you might have done is EOF and Resources which doesn't count as Encryptor. as the original code is still in tacked.

i did EOF and heading count changing, and did i ever say it was an encrypter? didn't think so, its anti-decompiler(program name ). Im still working on encryption for .net files
LRN2READ

[[MPGH]master131]

also has EOF & Im adding AES cryption btw didnt know u visited hf
Edit: adding AES and possibly XOR encryption and will release when i get home from school

hf? I never hang out there. I just found the code on some random VB topic in the Visual Basic section a week ago.

[Jabuuty671]

I think that we should be given the un-packed hacks
and then use your tool to pack it, and re-upload.
that'd be great

[Bombsaway707]

hf? I never hang out there. I just found the code on some random VB topic in the Visual Basic section a week ago.

Oh, that had been posted on HF for a good amount of time

I think that we should be given the un-packed hacks
and then use your tool to pack it, and re-upload.
that'd be great

if thats the case id better add alot more features to it

[CodeDemon]

I just tested your Anti-Decompiler on Reimys hack, and there were absolutely no binary differences in the file after using the Anti-Decompiler on it.

[Bombsaway707]

I just tested your Anti-Decompiler on Reimys hack, and there were absolutely no binary differences in the file after using the Anti-Decompiler on it.

ARE YOU RETARDED, ITS NOT A ENCRYPTER FOR THE 4TH TIME. YOU JUST CAN'T OPEN IT IN MOST DECOMPILERS

[CodeDemon]

ARE YOU RETARDED, ITS NOT A ENCRYPTER FOR THE 4TH TIME. YOU JUST CAN'T OPEN IT IN MOST DECOMPILERS

No matter what, it did, it would have created some binary differences in the file. Besides, its nearly impossible to decompile a non .net file, if anyone even had the knowledge to do that, why would they bother decompiling a public hack, anybody with that knowledge could reverse this game single handed.

[Bombsaway707]

No matter what, it did, it would have created some binary differences in the file. Besides, its nearly impossible to decompile a non .net file, if anyone even had the knowledge to do that, why would they bother decompiling a public hack, anybody with that knowledge could reverse this game single handed.

You sir, are a fucking moron. If it's impossible to decompile a non .net file then why would it need to be packed? In theory my application could protect it but i have better things to do then test that. And get a .dll file or .exe file. Open it, protect it and try to open it with a decompiler. Chances are it won't open. Explain that dumbass.

[Alessandro10]

Work for Me, thanks!