OVER 9000 SINS!!!!!

[[MPGH]Doc]

I am just curious to know if we have anyone who carry out their lives under beliefs shared by the Westboro Baptist Church.

@VirtualDUDE

[VirtualDUDE]

Why am i mentioned in this post, Doc?


Sir: The baptist church is just a group of insane people leaded by a mentally retarded man, and hes women. They're clearly wanting attention.

[[MPGH]Doc]

Why am i mentioned in this post, Doc?


Sir: The baptist church is just a group of insane people leaded by a mentally retarded man, and hes women. They're clearly wanting attention.

I just wanted to see what you thought about it. A lot of people would agree that you are one of the more radical "christians", but I didn't think you'd be that radical

[VirtualDUDE]

I just wanted to see what you thought about it. A lot of people would agree that you are one of the more radical "christians", but I didn't think you'd be that radical

Well. She's not Christian, obviously, nor has she spread the word of the lord.
She clearly has some sort of mental issues, there's no denial of that
Besides, the bible states (Black on white) That hate is an No-go, and you should only spread love.

Listening to her, argue with a respondent from anonymous makes me think shes a teenager trapped in a old womans body

[Trophy Wife]

Well. She's not Christian, obviously, nor has she spread the word of the lord.
She clearly has some sort of mental issues, there's no denial of that
Besides, the bible states (Black on white) That hate is an No-go, and you should only spread love.

Listening to her, argue with a respondent from anonymous makes me think shes a teenager trapped in a old womans body

I have to disagree. It seems rather presumptuous on your part to judge someone else's interpretation of the Bible as false because it doesn't match with the beliefs of your specific bastardized sect of Christianity. Who are you to judge who is and isn't correct? How is your interpretation of the Bible more valid than hers? Is it because yours is more socially acceptable? It seems to me that you're invalidating her position because she and her ilk have chosen to follow a literal interpretation of religious scripture, while you have most likely followed scripture a-la-carte, that is to say, you've sifted through scripture and cherry-picked the nice bits you want to follow and everything else not consistent with immediate social acceptance is discarded without second thought.

[[MPGH]Doc]

I have to disagree. It seems rather presumptuous on your part to judge someone else's interpretation of the Bible as false because it doesn't match with the beliefs of your specific bastardized sect of Christianity. Who are you to judge who is and isn't correct? How is your interpretation of the Bible more valid than hers? Is it because yours is more socially acceptable? It seems to me that you're invalidating her position because she and her ilk have chosen to follow a literal interpretation of religious scripture, while you have most likely followed scripture a-la-carte, that is to say, you've sifted through scripture and cherry-picked the nice bits you want to follow and everything else not consistent with immediate social acceptance is discarded without second thought.

Do you have a main account?

[Trophy Wife]

Do you have a main account?

This is my only account, if that's what you're asking. I signed up today after weeks of lurking.

[[MPGH]Doc]

This is my only account, if that's what you're asking. I signed up today after weeks of lurking.

Ok kewl. Welcome to MPGH and the debate section.

[Paroxysm]

I have to disagree. It seems rather presumptuous on your part to judge someone else's interpretation of the Bible as false because it doesn't match with the beliefs of your specific bastardized sect of Christianity. Who are you to judge who is and isn't correct? How is your interpretation of the Bible more valid than hers? Is it because yours is more socially acceptable? It seems to me that you're invalidating her position because she and her ilk have chosen to follow a literal interpretation of religious scripture, while you have most likely followed scripture a-la-carte, that is to say, you've sifted through scripture and cherry-picked the nice bits you want to follow and everything else not consistent with immediate social acceptance is discarded without second thought.

Wtf is this shit? A well-worded, even tempered, and reasonable response? You must be new. It won't last long.

[[MPGH]Doc]

Wtf is this shit? A well-worded, even tempered, and reasonable response? You must be new. It won't last long.

We have to preserve his rationality as long as possible.

[Trophy Wife]

Ok kewl. Welcome to MPGH and the debate section.

Thanks! Liking it so far.

Wtf is this shit? A well-worded, even tempered, and reasonable response? You must be new. It won't last long.

Haha! Challenge accepted!

[Paroxysm]

Give it a few debates with visible or empire and you'll end up like the rest of us.

[[MPGH]Doc]

Give it a few debates with visible or empire and you'll end up like the rest of us.

Don't forget that dragon dude and VirtualDUDE (I'm still undecided on whether Virtual and Visible are the same person or not).

[Paroxysm]

Don't forget that dragon dude and VirtualDUDE (I'm still undecided on whether Virtual and Visible are the same person or not).

It's irrelevant. Arguing that he is or isn't just leads to ad hominem arguments. We don't need that shit.

[[MPGH]Doc]

It's irrelevant. Arguing that he is or isn't just leads to ad hominem arguments. We don't need that shit.

Isn't this whole section just a cauldron of ad hominem arguments? It's rare to find a debate that doesn't stoop down to "you're stupid, your argument is invalid".

Perhaps new blood can spark something worthy of trying.