Vectors

[dariusgfx]

A few vectors i made , these are NOT filters , it takes hours in illustrator , and even longer when you just use the pen tool in photoshop , like i did.

[IMG]https://i197.photobucke*****m/albums/aa43/dariukevin/wizprogress.png[/IMG]
[IMG]https://i197.photobucke*****m/albums/aa43/dariukevin/portfolio/FFYT.png[/IMG]
[IMG]https://i197.photobucke*****m/albums/aa43/dariukevin/BIGSEANVECTOR.png[/IMG]

[Ryan]

Post screenies of .psd.

[dariusgfx]

ok , hold on. i may have to get my desktop for one .

Drake :

https://screensnapr.com/e/u9ETmC.png

Big Sean :

View scOaOT.png on ScreenSnapr

Wiz (changed text) :


https://screensnapr.com/e/xtJ5KT.png
https://screensnapr.com/e/4QJ2pJ.png

[apeguy]

ok , hold on. i may have to get my desktop for one .

Drake :

https://screensnapr.com/e/u9ETmC.png

Big Sean :

View scOaOT.png on ScreenSnapr

Wiz (changed text) :


https://screensnapr.com/e/xtJ5KT.png
https://screensnapr.com/e/4QJ2pJ.png

Gotta say, those are pretty bad ass pictures you made.

[Scrcrw]

ur pentool is really choppy, what makes a great vector is the smoothness
the beard on the second one is really choppy, especially with the texture

[dariusgfx]

ur pentool is really choppy, what makes a great vector is the smoothness
the beard on the second one is really choppy, especially with the texture

well have a vector battle ! :P

But its a pen tool? most vectors are smooth because most vectors are made and supposed to be made in illustrator. Im not making an excuse , I could have done much better , but you cant expect it to be perfect.

[Scrcrw]

well have a vector battle ! :P

But its a pen tool? most vectors are smooth because most vectors are made and supposed to be made in illustrator. Im not making an excuse , I could have done much better , but you cant expect it to be perfect.

i dont do vectors, im just telling u where you could improve

[dariusgfx]

i dont do vectors, im just telling u where you could improve

I understand , im just saying it wont be perfect in photoshop.

thanks for comments.

[Mokou-Sama]

Its not bad, i dont do vectors aswell so I cant say anything to impove. aint my area yet.

[Faux]

Its done in photoshop. So its not a vector. Its called a "Vexel".

[[MPGH]Ethereal]

Its done in photoshop. So its not a vector. Its called a "Vexel".

Not true.

First of all, photoshop not capable of VECTORS is not true. True vectors are supposed to enlarge any size, and still not change any shape or form. They should not pixelize. So some people say that photoshop is a raster program, therefore the images that it makes (like vectoring in photoshop) makes it not a true vector, because it supposedly pixelizes. That, however, is invalid.

Second of all, photoshop is still a raster program, no matter if it creates vectors or vexels. So if you enlarge something...ALL the pictures would come out pixelated, not just the vectors. If you go to Photoshop, Edit>Image Size, and instead of PIXELS, you change the percentage to let's say...800, then the results would be a larger image of a vector that is NOT pixelated.

In fact, go to Illustrator, zoom in the vector you did in PHOTOSHOP, and you will not see something pixelated.

Even in photoshop, if you save the file as .EPS, you will have an option as "Include Vector Data." If you cannot vector in photoshop, then why does it have that? It's as simple as it can be. You can vector in PS.

[Faux]

Not true.

First of all, photoshop not capable of VECTORS is not true. True vectors are supposed to enlarge any size, and still not change any shape or form. They should not pixelize. So some people say that photoshop is a raster program, therefore the images that it makes (like vectoring in photoshop) makes it not a true vector, because it supposedly pixelizes. That, however, is invalid.

Second of all, photoshop is still a raster program, no matter if it creates vectors or vexels. So if you enlarge something...ALL the pictures would come out pixelated, not just the vectors. If you go to Photoshop, Edit>Image Size, and instead of PIXELS, you change the percentage to let's say...800, then the results would be a larger image of a vector that is NOT pixelated.

In fact, go to Illustrator, zoom in the vector you did in PHOTOSHOP, and you will not see something pixelated.

Even in photoshop, if you save the file as .EPS, you will have an option as "Include Vector Data." If you cannot vector in photoshop, then why does it have that? It's as simple as it can be. You can vector in PS.

Your argument is valid. I shall now shut the fuck up.

[[MPGH]Ethereal]

Your argument is valid. I shall now shut the fuck up.

In all fairness to you it's a pretty common misconception amongst graphic artists.

[dariusgfx]

Its done in photoshop. So its not a vector. Its called a "Vexel".

not really , if you notice my .psd layers are shapes that can be enlarged and they wont become pixelated , which is the definition of a vector to my understanding?

edit : nvm, thanks ethereal

[Keroaplt]

As Scr said really choppy you need to make it smooth it's not about what you used it's about how you made it
If you make a vector square that doesn't mean it's gonna be smooth it's still gonna be a square