CoD = 1 player can win the whole game for you.
BF = people have to work together.
CoD = 1 player can win the whole game for you.
BF = people have to work together.
+1
Seriously, those "Objective-Based" Gamemodes like "Domination" and "Sabotage" are faaaaaaaaaar away from being Objective-Based. Customizable Killstreaks killed Call of Duty. Since then people only camp trying to get their "Chopper Gunner", which u can get in BF3 by simply getting into that Havoc/Apache that stands around. World at War was the last good Call of Duty.
I am so freakin tired of these threads. Why the hell does people have to draw conclusions and comparisons months before the games are released? Can't you guys just shut up and wait until they come out?
Only retards says one game is better than another, only based on graphics or something else. There is no definitive answer to what game is the best, because people like different things.
Gran Turismo is far more realistic and has much better graphics than Need For Speed. Yet, alot of people find NFS more fun to play because it's a different, not stereotypical racing game.
im still a CoD fanboy
and its all in the game play.
Did you guys actually read my thread? You think Battlefield is more popular than COD? lolz what evs ive played all the new battlefields including BC2, BC1, Medal of Honor etc. These all get boring after a few months if not weeks. Ive been playing cod for years and still loving it. Just my opinion (:
I'm buying both games, I don't know why there is ALWAYS a war on this shit.