Fogest (09-08-2011)
Fogest (09-08-2011)
Yeah game play defiantly makes more of a difference than graphics do, and its all just about preference. Sometimes I feel like playing CoD other times I feel like playing BF
[IMG]https://i1213.photobucke*****m/albums/cc463/masks1/my_loving_flame_by_mj_magic-d5gkrqk.jpg[/IMG]
"Christian Bible, the Gospel of Mark, chapter five, verse nine. We acknowledge this as an appropriate metaphor. We are Legion, a terminal of the Geth. We will integrate into Normandy."
-Legion
I don't understand why the MW3 fans are up in arms. There is gameplay footage for anyone wanting a less-bias appeal. And with the looks of the two.. as usual CoD delivers the same old stuff.. just a new scenario and a few new additions (maps, guns, etc).
BF3 from BF2 obviously there is a clear upgrade.
I also don't understand how anyone could say MW3 has better gameplay when it lacks everything in comparison of the two. MW3 is merely for your FPS bads that are incapable of taking it to the next level.
Last edited by Khyy; 09-08-2011 at 10:44 PM.
Hosav (09-17-2011),Noovaa (09-12-2011),SupremeJr' (09-14-2011)
No, you are just like running and shooting, that is the full description of CoD.
In BF you play as a team, you have to make decisions, you can't run around like an one man army.
And the maps are huge and you can use various types of vehicles, don't compare the effort put into BF3 to the one put into MW3.
BF3 took 6 years to make, MW3 took 9 months.
Whatever, your point just proves that you are childish.
Where do you live?On the moon? MW didnt took 2 months it took 1 and a half to 2 years to make.How the hell did you come up whit 9 months?Black ops isnt by Infinity its by treyarch so the guys at infinity had 2 years to make a good game and they failed.
My opinion BF3 will beat COD MW3
Post Goals:
50 posts ()
100 posts ()
150 posts ()
200 posts ()
500 posts ()
1000 posts ()
although frostbite 2 has incredible quality well have to get the game on our hands to test the gameplay, here frostbite 2 wins by far, lightning, smokes and SSAO are far superior than MW2, but well have to wait for MW3, it'd be better for them if they released a Demo, just like battlefield is trying to in mid-late september
TROLL PHILOSOPHY
An action is worth a thousand words, therefore, pressing thanks is worth saying thanks a thousand times....
Before Flame war continues to rage ON lets poor some water shall we?
DOnt ever compare COD with BF why you say first BF is veicule based while cod is Infantry based anyone who plays both games will know this unless n00b factor is involved.
Second Cod is Flash and grab action So while on BF3 you can spend 30 min playng only one sension a normal cod match takes about 15 min tops.
Graphics So Frostibite vs Iw 5.0 (this is the tricky part) COD dident ever need pretty Setttings players that have been arround since the COD 1 know that Cod maps are usualy about hiding Shooting and rushing most people wont even notice the settings arround them without using a scoped gun.
While on BF huge cenarys and landscapes are the players delight since they basicly dont have nothing to look at when theyr driving theyr veicules.
So shall we put an end to this discussion?
Music historian here to please and displease,learning to teach all you peeps,so stop by the music part of the forum,and ask the question to your needs.
Battlefield's maps have PLENTY to look at. Maybe you should play BFBC2 before coming to conclusions. Vehicles aren't plentiful in Battlefield, there's only a few at the spawn, so some people are either gonna have to hitch a ride or just run there.
First, he's not born in the US or in the UK, so don't expect him to speak proper English.
Secondly, he's not saying anything dissing BF3 at all. He's on our side.
Last edited by Sly Tendencies; 09-14-2011 at 12:58 PM.
Fogest (09-14-2011)
Fogest (09-14-2011)