Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 86
  1. #16
    IHaxYou!'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Gender
    male
    Location
    HaxLand
    Posts
    936
    Reputation
    -18
    Thanks
    387
    My Mood
    Cynical
    Quote Originally Posted by Noovaa View Post
    Then why the hell do you play Cod?

    BF is better in all of those departments.

    And the graphics are better, Its a win-win.
    [IMG]https://i208.photobucke*****m/albums/bb15/Exodiaj/bf3_mw3_compare.jpg[/IMG]
    I said I don't give a fuck about graphics.
    And I don't like battlefield.
    I've played it a few time's but I'm not the type of person that like's doing objectives and shit.
    I just like fast FPS.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to IHaxYou! For This Useful Post:

    Fogest (09-08-2011)

  3. #17
    Fogest's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Gender
    male
    Location
    Canada, Ontario
    Posts
    3,096
    Reputation
    164
    Thanks
    10,455
    My Mood
    Amazed
    Quote Originally Posted by IHaxYou! View Post
    I said I don't give a fuck about graphics.
    And I don't like battlefield.
    I've played it a few time's but I'm not the type of person that like's doing objectives and shit.
    I just like fast FPS.
    Yeah I don't even play on a HD tv so the quality makes no difference to me. I also only really care about the gameplay.

  4. #18
    Commander X's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Gender
    male
    Location
    Anonymous
    Posts
    723
    Reputation
    83
    Thanks
    2,859
    Yeah game play defiantly makes more of a difference than graphics do, and its all just about preference. Sometimes I feel like playing CoD other times I feel like playing BF
    [IMG]https://i1213.photobucke*****m/albums/cc463/masks1/my_loving_flame_by_mj_magic-d5gkrqk.jpg[/IMG]

    "Christian Bible, the Gospel of Mark, chapter five, verse nine. We acknowledge this as an appropriate metaphor. We are Legion, a terminal of the Geth. We will integrate into Normandy."
    -Legion

  5. #19
    Khyy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Gender
    male
    Posts
    1,320
    Reputation
    107
    Thanks
    1,493
    I don't understand why the MW3 fans are up in arms. There is gameplay footage for anyone wanting a less-bias appeal. And with the looks of the two.. as usual CoD delivers the same old stuff.. just a new scenario and a few new additions (maps, guns, etc).

    BF3 from BF2 obviously there is a clear upgrade.

    I also don't understand how anyone could say MW3 has better gameplay when it lacks everything in comparison of the two. MW3 is merely for your FPS bads that are incapable of taking it to the next level.
    Last edited by Khyy; 09-08-2011 at 10:44 PM.

  6. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Khyy For This Useful Post:

    Hosav (09-17-2011),Noovaa (09-12-2011),SupremeJr' (09-14-2011)

  7. #20
    oleksx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Gender
    male
    Location
    Right behind you
    Posts
    119
    Reputation
    10
    Thanks
    51
    My Mood
    Amused
    Quote Originally Posted by IHaxYou! View Post
    I said I don't give a fuck about graphics.
    And I don't like battlefield.
    I've played it a few time's but I'm not the type of person that like's doing objectives and shit.
    I just like fast FPS.
    No, you are just like running and shooting, that is the full description of CoD.
    In BF you play as a team, you have to make decisions, you can't run around like an one man army.
    And the maps are huge and you can use various types of vehicles, don't compare the effort put into BF3 to the one put into MW3.
    BF3 took 6 years to make, MW3 took 9 months.
    Whatever, your point just proves that you are childish.

  8. #21
    Noovaa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Gender
    female
    Posts
    1,613
    Reputation
    51
    Thanks
    143
    Quote Originally Posted by oleksx View Post
    No, you are just like running and shooting, that is the full description of CoD.
    In BF you play as a team, you have to make decisions, you can't run around like an one man army.
    And the maps are huge and you can use various types of vehicles, don't compare the effort put into BF3 to the one put into MW3.
    BF3 took 6 years to make, MW3 took 9 months.
    Whatever, your point just proves that you are childish.
    BF3 infantry game put up with MW3 the game, BF3 in my opinion comes on top. This is not including the customization in BF3, and the fact it has cars, planes, and tanks.

  9. #22
    Moshos1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Gender
    male
    Location
    Outside your window.
    Posts
    333
    Reputation
    10
    Thanks
    14
    My Mood
    Lonely
    Quote Originally Posted by oleksx View Post
    No, you are just like running and shooting, that is the full description of CoD.
    In BF you play as a team, you have to make decisions, you can't run around like an one man army.
    And the maps are huge and you can use various types of vehicles, don't compare the effort put into BF3 to the one put into MW3.
    BF3 took 6 years to make, MW3 took 9 months.
    Whatever, your point just proves that you are childish.
    Firstly, learn proper English.
    Secondly, are you retarded? How is he childish for stating the obvious? BF3 CLEARLY has better graphics, so don't try and denie it.







  10. #23
    dario354's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Gender
    male
    Location
    Slovenia
    Posts
    170
    Reputation
    10
    Thanks
    117
    My Mood
    Amazed
    Quote Originally Posted by oleksx View Post
    No, you are just like running and shooting, that is the full description of CoD.
    In BF you play as a team, you have to make decisions, you can't run around like an one man army.
    And the maps are huge and you can use various types of vehicles, don't compare the effort put into BF3 to the one put into MW3.
    BF3 took 6 years to make, MW3 took 9 months.
    Whatever, your point just proves that you are childish.
    Where do you live?On the moon? MW didnt took 2 months it took 1 and a half to 2 years to make.How the hell did you come up whit 9 months?Black ops isnt by Infinity its by treyarch so the guys at infinity had 2 years to make a good game and they failed.

    My opinion BF3 will beat COD MW3
    Post Goals:
    50 posts ()
    100 posts ()
    150 posts ()
    200 posts ()
    500 posts ()
    1000 posts ()



  11. #24
    crappy74's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Gender
    male
    Location
    in a dream, within a dream.
    Posts
    429
    Reputation
    -46
    Thanks
    35
    My Mood
    Relaxed
    although frostbite 2 has incredible quality well have to get the game on our hands to test the gameplay, here frostbite 2 wins by far, lightning, smokes and SSAO are far superior than MW2, but well have to wait for MW3, it'd be better for them if they released a Demo, just like battlefield is trying to in mid-late september




    TROLL PHILOSOPHY
    An action is worth a thousand words, therefore, pressing thanks is worth saying thanks a thousand times....

  12. #25
    Occidi de Pax's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Gender
    male
    Location
    Back To The Drum!
    Posts
    3,065
    Reputation
    102
    Thanks
    180
    My Mood
    Bored
    Before Flame war continues to rage ON lets poor some water shall we?
    DOnt ever compare COD with BF why you say first BF is veicule based while cod is Infantry based anyone who plays both games will know this unless n00b factor is involved.
    Second Cod is Flash and grab action So while on BF3 you can spend 30 min playng only one sension a normal cod match takes about 15 min tops.
    Graphics So Frostibite vs Iw 5.0 (this is the tricky part) COD dident ever need pretty Setttings players that have been arround since the COD 1 know that Cod maps are usualy about hiding Shooting and rushing most people wont even notice the settings arround them without using a scoped gun.
    While on BF huge cenarys and landscapes are the players delight since they basicly dont have nothing to look at when theyr driving theyr veicules.
    So shall we put an end to this discussion?
    Music historian here to please and displease,learning to teach all you peeps,so stop by the music part of the forum,and ask the question to your needs.

  13. #26
    Noovaa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Gender
    female
    Posts
    1,613
    Reputation
    51
    Thanks
    143
    Quote Originally Posted by ultimateon View Post
    Before Flame war continues to rage ON lets poor some water shall we?
    DOnt ever compare COD with BF why you say first BF is veicule based while cod is Infantry based anyone who plays both games will know this unless n00b factor is involved.
    Second Cod is Flash and grab action So while on BF3 you can spend 30 min playng only one sension a normal cod match takes about 15 min tops.
    Graphics So Frostibite vs Iw 5.0 (this is the tricky part) COD dident ever need pretty Setttings players that have been arround since the COD 1 know that Cod maps are usualy about hiding Shooting and rushing most people wont even notice the settings arround them without using a scoped gun.
    While on BF huge cenarys and landscapes are the players delight since they basicly dont have nothing to look at when theyr driving theyr veicules.
    So shall we put an end to this discussion?
    So true, besides the fact battlefields gun game is still better then cods. Battlefield just has so much more to offer then cod.

  14. #27
    Sly Tendencies's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Gender
    male
    Posts
    246
    Reputation
    -1
    Thanks
    19
    My Mood
    Tired
    Quote Originally Posted by ultimateon View Post
    Before Flame war continues to rage ON lets poor some water shall we?
    DOnt ever compare COD with BF why you say first BF is veicule based while cod is Infantry based anyone who plays both games will know this unless n00b factor is involved.
    Second Cod is Flash and grab action So while on BF3 you can spend 30 min playng only one sension a normal cod match takes about 15 min tops.
    Graphics So Frostibite vs Iw 5.0 (this is the tricky part) COD dident ever need pretty Setttings players that have been arround since the COD 1 know that Cod maps are usualy about hiding Shooting and rushing most people wont even notice the settings arround them without using a scoped gun.
    While on BF huge cenarys and landscapes are the players delight since they basicly dont have nothing to look at when theyr driving theyr veicules.
    So shall we put an end to this discussion?
    Battlefield's maps have PLENTY to look at. Maybe you should play BFBC2 before coming to conclusions. Vehicles aren't plentiful in Battlefield, there's only a few at the spawn, so some people are either gonna have to hitch a ride or just run there.


    Quote Originally Posted by Moshos1 View Post


    Firstly, learn proper English.
    Secondly, are you retarded? How is he childish for stating the obvious? BF3 CLEARLY has better graphics, so don't try and denie it.
    First, he's not born in the US or in the UK, so don't expect him to speak proper English.
    Secondly, he's not saying anything dissing BF3 at all. He's on our side.
    Last edited by Sly Tendencies; 09-14-2011 at 12:58 PM.

  15. #28
    Fogest's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Gender
    male
    Location
    Canada, Ontario
    Posts
    3,096
    Reputation
    164
    Thanks
    10,455
    My Mood
    Amazed
    Quote Originally Posted by dario354 View Post
    Where do you live?On the moon? MW didnt took 2 months it took 1 and a half to 2 years to make.How the hell did you come up whit 9 months?Black ops isnt by Infinity its by treyarch so the guys at infinity had 2 years to make a good game and they failed.

    My opinion BF3 will beat COD MW3
    Infantry ward isn't making it.

    Sledehamer games is.

  16. #29
    Tick Me On's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Gender
    male
    Location
    ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
    Posts
    295
    Reputation
    9
    Thanks
    32
    Quote Originally Posted by Fogest View Post



    Infantry ward isn't making it.

    Sledehamer games is.
    *cough*Infinity*cough*

    Also, yes, Infinity Ward is making it, ALONG with Sledgehammer Games and Raven Studios. Granted that only a few original people are left from Infinity Ward, it is still a developer.

  17. The Following User Says Thank You to Tick Me On For This Useful Post:

    Fogest (09-14-2011)

  18. #30
    Sly Tendencies's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Gender
    male
    Posts
    246
    Reputation
    -1
    Thanks
    19
    My Mood
    Tired
    Quote Originally Posted by Tick Me On View Post
    *cough*Infinity*cough*

    Also, yes, Infinity Ward is making it, ALONG with Sledgehammer Games and Raven Studios. Granted that only a few original people are left from Infinity Ward, it is still a developer.
    Might as well be called Infantry Ward, all their games have is infantry based combat.

  19. The Following User Says Thank You to Sly Tendencies For This Useful Post:

    Fogest (09-14-2011)

Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast