NC Infraction,

[Viibez]

First of all how was that a non-topic image spam when the OP was Greed.

Second how was that baiting, when Greeds insults people all the time and never get infracted (Look at Sync - Greed)

Third he deleted 18 posts in that thread to get logs.

[Hannibal]

I believe that just image posts (no text) are allowed as long as it's relevant to the OP. In this case it is.

[[MPGH]Disturbed]

[img]https://imgur.com/LELmk.png[/img

First of all how was that a non-topic image spam when the OP was Greed.

Second how was that baiting, when Greeds insults people all the time and never get infracted (Look at Sync - Greed)

Third he deleted 18 posts in that thread to get logs.

It's off topic because the thread wasn't about ignore lists, you posted that to piss him off. (Hence the baiting.)

[Viibez]

It's off topic because the thread wasn't about ignore lists, you posted that to piss him off. (Hence the baiting.)

To piss him off when i can't even see his post(s)?

[[MPGH]Disturbed]

To piss him off when i can't even see his post(s)?

Doesn't matter, it's baiting.

[Viibez]

Doesn't matter, it's baiting.

Nope it's not.

Everything for you is baiting

Can someone please check this thread? -.-'

[[MPGH]Disturbed]

Nope it's not.

Everything for you is baiting

Can someone please check this thread? -.-'

You're just making shit up. Half of your "dispute" is bullshit and the other half is eye for an eye logic.


Just because you're baiting a troll, doesn't mean it's not baiting.


I should probably tell you can't get the infraction overturned if you are only going to argue about the baiting, the infraction was also for off topic image spam.

[[MPGH]Thunder]

It was baiting, off-topic and image spam

Well deserved infraction albert

[[MPGH]Dave84311]

It was baiting, off-topic and image spam

Well deserved infraction albert

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^