There should be a rule change

[InCognito]

for image spamming. If you only have a post with nothing in it with a picture, you get an infraction. Should be changed so that if the picture doesn't have a caption you get infracted, I see people type like "umad bro" and don't get infracted but every time I post a picture with a caption I get infracted. /tire

[Taco]

apparently, your post cant be more than....90% picture?
i dont remember the rule, but if there are no text (normal typing) above or below the picture, you get infraction.

[Azathᴏth]

Or if I post an emoticon or a relevant picture.

It's SPAM if it's annoying and repetitive. It's one thing to have image wars.

[Jigsaw]

Yes yes and yes.

[InCognito]

Or if I post an emoticon or a relevant picture.

It's SPAM if it's annoying and repetitive. It's one thing to have image wars.

It is relevant, I get pictures that has what I was going to say in them, not like the pictures are completely blank.

[Azathᴏth]

It is relevant, I get pictures that has what I was going to say in them, not like the pictures are completely blank.

That's the point I'm pushing. It's spam only if it's irrelevant, or it's repetitive.

[Smurfyv]

It should. But only emoticans should be the "image spam"

[InCognito]

That's the point I'm pushing. It's spam only if it's irrelevant, or it's repetitive.

[iTzSeyeko.]

Totally agree with you man
Gms are gettn a lil bit strict and are gonna kill the site...

[Azathᴏth]

That's just retarded. I think it should be revised to no more then 3 consecutive image-only posts.

[Poison]

Totally agree with this sir

[Nico]

Kinda weird. If you wrote "Do not want" instead of posting that picture you wouldnt have been infracted. Makes no sense.

[Ne-Yo]

That would be a bit too harsh.

[[MPGH]Hero]

Well yeah, I do agree that they should do so. But at least the average user posting an image should post something along their post as well. Just saves the infraction.