The Scale of the Universe

[noob555]

I swear I will publish a paper on the Ignorance of the MPGH Canadians...

Yet you don't have a basic understanding of half your theories posted let alone a comprehensive understanding. Not saying hes right(I'm saying he's wrong), I'm even understand half the shit you posted. lol
If you're going to start listing more facts and pretending you understand the concepts you listed, just cut the crap. You didn't even use the simplest arguments to shut him down, instead you pulled out a list of theories from, what wikipedia? in an attempt to shut down his argument using something which neither of you have an understanding of.

[Domo]

Yet you don't have a basic understanding of half your theories posted let alone a comprehensive understanding. Not saying hes right(I'm saying he's wrong), I'm even understand half the shit you posted. lol
If you're going to start listing more facts and pretending you understand the concepts you listed, just cut the crap. You didn't even use the simplest arguments to shut him down, instead you pulled out a list of theories from, what wikipedia? in an attempt to shut down his argument using something which neither of you have an understanding of.

Probably never got told to not use Wikipedia as a source of information cuz it's based on other people's OPINIONS and some facts AREN'T true.

[noob555]

Probably never got told to not use Wikipedia as a source of information cuz it's based on other people's OPINIONS and some facts AREN'T true.

Oh now you're being dumb too lol. Wikipedia is one of the most reliable sources on the internet, I'm calling him out on not understanding the information listed on wikipedia.

[[MPGH]Liz]

Thinking of ourselves as irrelevant in a greater scope isn't exactly true because every action we make causes thousands of other things to happen. In a decade we can master sciences which can cause much larger events to happen. The same way flies are part of the food chain which ultimately helps keep us alive. Nothing we do is small, everything we do can cause a ton of changes to happen. A single click of multiple buttons(nukes) can destroy what nature took millions of years to form. imo I think everyone is connected, every action we make contributes to much greater developments. These developments can affect this greater scope in much greater ways then we can imagine. /

I don't see how anything I've said meant that we are irrelevant. Being small, or living a short amount of time does not make you irrelevant.

[Domo]

Oh now you're being dumb too lol. Wikipedia is one of the most reliable sources on the internet, I'm calling him out on not understanding the information listed on wikipedia.

uh not really if you look at your own textbook and then look at some information on Wikipedia they do not match, besides people edit wikipedia which is a reason why it is not a good source of information.

[Commander X]

Yet you don't have a basic understanding of half your theories posted let alone a comprehensive understanding. Not saying hes right(I'm saying he's wrong), I'm even understand half the shit you posted. lol
If you're going to start listing more facts and pretending you understand the concepts you listed, just cut the crap. You didn't even use the simplest arguments to shut him down, instead you pulled out a list of theories from, what wikipedia? in an attempt to shut down his argument using something which neither of you have an understanding of.

It just so happens that I did research on these topics while I took physics a month or two ago.
I can't prove that I know this shit and all of the mathematics behind it, but really try to tell me all about how dark matter can exist because of open string theory, you can't simply pull that from Wikipedia. I'm not trying to argue with you and I'm not pulling this from wikipedia either.

[noob555]

OH SRRY FER NAWT BELIEVING IN BULLSHIT THEORIES THAT PEOPLE MAKE UP ON THERE SPARE TIME, you're clearly ignorant, that string theory is probably as realistic as White holes, it's complete bullshit.
Don't get your panties in a bunch because you lost an argument, Universe = everything.
Therefore there can't be two, /end.

Stop calling people ignorant.
You probably don't even have an basic comprehension of string theory. The fact that you're saying string theory is bull shit means you probably haven't done any research what so ever. Also the fact that you're using an dictionary definition as the basis of your entire argument that multiple universes don't exist is quite ridiculous. If you want to pull that shit, I'll pull that shit as well. Multiverse | Define Multiverse at Dictionary.com
Multiverse-the aggregate of all existing matter, of which the universe is but a tiny fragment
There goes your ENTIRE argument.

---------- Post added at 07:41 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:39 PM ----------

uh not really if you look at your own textbook and then look at some information on Wikipedia they do not match, besides people edit wikipedia which is a reason why it is not a good source of information.

And if you look at your textbooks, you'll realize that most of them were written by people that come from community-state colleges, as well as being published from texas. While on the contrary, the people publishing stuff like the string theory are people that come from colleges like M.I.T., Harvard, etc etc.

[Canadian]

Stop calling people ignorant.
You probably don't even have an basic comprehension of string theory. The fact that you're saying string theory is bull shit means you probably haven't done any research what so ever. Also the fact that you're using an dictionary definition as the basis of your entire argument that multiple universes don't exist is quite ridiculous. If you want to pull that shit, I'll pull that shit as well. Multiverse | Define Multiverse at Dictionary.com
Multiverse-the aggregate of all existing matter, of which the universe is but a tiny fragment
There goes your ENTIRE argument.

---------- Post added at 07:41 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:39 PM ----------



And if you look at your textbooks, you'll realize that most of them were written by people that come from community-state colleges, as well as being published from texas. lol.

How does that blow away my whole argument? I'll stick to my opinion being that there is one universe, you can stick to your "multiverse" being more than 1 everythings ok.

[Commander X]

OH SRRY FER NAWT BELIEVING IN BULLSHIT THEORIES THAT PEOPLE MAKE UP ON THERE SPARE TIME, you're clearly ignorant, that string theory is probably as realistic as White holes, it's complete bullshit.
Don't get your panties in a bunch because you lost an argument, Universe = everything.
Therefore there can't be two, /end.

Okay since your basing your argument on definitions so will I.
Canadians = Dumbfucks
MUST BE TRUE IT'S A DEFINITION.
An Introduction to String Theory and D-Brane Dynamics by Richard Szabo. Read the book then come back.

[Domo]

Stop calling people ignorant.
You probably don't even have an basic comprehension of string theory. The fact that you're saying string theory is bull shit means you probably haven't done any research what so ever. Also the fact that you're using an dictionary definition as the basis of your entire argument that multiple universes don't exist is quite ridiculous. If you want to pull that shit, I'll pull that shit as well. Multiverse | Define Multiverse at Dictionary.com
Multiverse-the aggregate of all existing matter, of which the universe is but a tiny fragment
There goes your ENTIRE argument.

---------- Post added at 07:41 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:39 PM ----------



And if you look at your textbooks, you'll realize that most of them were written by people that come from community-state colleges, as well as being published from texas. While on the contrary, the people publishing stuff like the string theory are people that come from colleges like M.I.T., Harvard, etc etc.

Sadly how do you know mine is not written by people that are from colleges like M.I.T? All your doing is making assumptions, and also your definition may or may not be true. So can be mine, as google definition has stated it is the name for everything that exists, yet if you search multiverse it says it's only a part of it.

[Mischievious]

How do they exactly know any of this since the farthest they have made it is to the moon, thats what i want to know.

[Commander X]

How do they exactly know any of this since the farthest they have made it is to the moon, thats what i want to know.

You can recreate the big bang and the expansion of the universe through models, programs, and equations on computers.

[noob555]

How does that blow away my whole argument? I'll stick to my opinion being that there is one universe, you can stick to your "multiverse" being more than 1 everythings ok.

Your logic=
everything=universe
So theres only 1 universe

My logic=
There are multiple dimensions( 3-D[us], 2-D etc)
Multiple Dimensions= Multiple universes
Multiple dimensions= Multiple versions of every object in every universe

Throughout your argument you've been backing yourself up using dictionary definitions, without using any science.
If you believe in written text based on an incomplete observation, rather than completed text based on a much broader spectrum of observation. You might as well convert to the thing which you despise. Religion.

---------- Post added at 07:57 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:55 PM ----------

Sadly how do you know mine is not written by people that are from colleges like M.I.T? All your doing is making assumptions, and also your definition may or may not be true. So can be mine, as google definition has stated it is the name for everything that exists, yet if you search multiverse it says it's only a part of it.

You're going to tell me your school has text books written by researchers LOL. You're funny. Researchers=1 field+incomplete knowledge
Researchers write books, not text books.
Text books are basically books that list the laws of a science and SOME theories without going into depth in either. If a researcher writes a textbook it would be bias, and not considered a textbook.

[Mischievious]

You can recreate the big bang and the expansion of the universe through models, programs, and equations on computers.

Yeah , NO , computers cannot recreate shit they have not seen, and the big bang has nothing to do with the universe, this is the thing, they don't actually know whats out there, they just say random bullshit and color in shit to get more science funding, unless they go and do a live stream out there of all of this crap, I say its just crap they made up, have you actually been to any of those places? No you have not, therefore you cannot say they are real or not , they could be, and they could not be, but I am going to say they most likely are not real due to there is nothing to back it up accept pictures that they colored in on there computers, thanks anyways.

[InCognito]

uh not really if you look at your own textbook and then look at some information on Wikipedia they do not match, besides people edit wikipedia which is a reason why it is not a good source of information.

Not joining whatever you guys are talking about, knowledge come from others. There is usually always a source in the Wikipedia page.