What about a hack downloader?

[♪~ ᕕ(ᐛ)ᕗ]

I am really bored so I think I would made a hack downloader for MPGH...Like you select your favorite game and see which hacks are released for it, then you click a link and download it....? Just saying but to do this, I need the help of sum MPGH minions to keep me updated about the latest releases for each game.....

[heya:D]

Yeah...... How about no.

I don't think thIs allowed

[[MPGH]Time]

If you do make one make sure it only lets you download after the uploader has been thanked maybe? .

[Jorndel]

I am really bored so I think I would made a hack downloader for MPGH...Like you select your favorite game and see which hacks are released for it, then you click a link and download it....? Just saying but to do this, I need the help of sum MPGH minions to keep me updated about the latest releases for each game.....

if Dave would approve. (He will not)
It would be very easy.

Step 1:
Web-Browser Control

Step 2:
Looping all the sites Elements.

Step 3:
Check the ClassName to get the [Release] Tag

Step 4:
Get the link of the thread

Step 5:
Get the Download link from the thread when selected.

Something I made for the Collection Threads: (The Main Function of it)

void Act()
        {
            if (c==1)
            {
                HtmlElementCollection Doc = webBrowser1.Document.All;
                foreach (HtmlElement Ele in Doc)
                {
                    if (Ele.GetAttribute("className") == "prefix understate")
                    {
                        if (Ele.OuterHtml.Contains(textBox1.Text)) // Release Tag
                            Yes = true;
                    }

                    if (Ele.GetAttribute("className") == "title" && Yes)
                    {
                        string Temp = Ele.OuterHtml;
                        Temp = Temp.Remove(0, Temp.IndexOf("href") + 6);
                        Temp = Temp.Remove(Temp.IndexOf(".html") + 5);
                        richTextBox1.AppendText("" + Ele.InnerText + "\n");
                        Yes = false;
                    }
                }
                label1.Text = "Ready";
            }
        }

[♪~ ᕕ(ᐛ)ᕗ]

Yeah...... How about no.

I don't think thIs allowed

Why it's not allowed? Even if I release the source code too?

---------- Post added at 10:39 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:37 AM ----------

if Dave would approve. (He will not)
It would be very easy.

Step 1:
Web-Browser Control

Step 2:
Looping all the sites Elements.

Step 3:
Check the ClassName to get the [Release] Tag

Step 4:
Get the link of the thread

Step 5:
Get the Download link from the thread when selected.

Something I made for the Collection Threads: (The Main Function of it)

void Act()
        {
            if (c==1)
            {
                HtmlElementCollection Doc = webBrowser1.Document.All;
                foreach (HtmlElement Ele in Doc)
                {
                    if (Ele.GetAttribute("className") == "prefix understate")
                    {
                        if (Ele.OuterHtml.Contains(textBox1.Text)) // Release Tag
                            Yes = true;
                    }

                    if (Ele.GetAttribute("className") == "title" && Yes)
                    {
                        string Temp = Ele.OuterHtml;
                        Temp = Temp.Remove(0, Temp.IndexOf("href") + 6);
                        Temp = Temp.Remove(Temp.IndexOf(".html") + 5);
                        richTextBox1.AppendText("" + Ele.InnerText + "\n");
                        Yes = false;
                    }
                }
                label1.Text = "Ready";
            }
        }

You would need the credentials of the user to do that, so it is better (more safe for the users) to re-upload the downloads somewhere else (like a personal FTP server) and then use a cache file to download them.

[Jorndel]

Why it's not allowed? Even if I release the source code too?

---------- Post added at 10:39 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:37 AM ----------



You would need the credentials of the user to do that, so it is better (more safe for the users) to re-upload the downloads somewhere else (like a personal FTP server) and then use a cache file to download them.

Waste of time :|

One other way, but not sure if I can tell :P (Just some stuff...)
Anyway, why Dave would not approve this:

1: Lose of members. (Because they don't have to go to the site)
2: Less Activity (Because they no longer have to visit us )
3: We would not let our hacks be easy to leech by using the tool.
4: We just like to have it on the site

[heya:D]

I've tried this but was turned down since it is not allowed
Dave doesn't allow it

[♪~ ᕕ(ᐛ)ᕗ]

Waste of time :|

One other way, but not sure if I can tell :P (Just some stuff...)
Anyway, why Dave would not approve this:

1: Lose of members. (Because they don't have to go to the site)
2: Less Activity (Because they no longer have to visit us )
3: We would not let our hacks be easy to leech by using the tool.
4: We just like to have it on the site

Oh yeah makes sense...:/

[Delko DJ]

its a good idea but everyone would abuse with it cuz no one would register and everyone will use 1 public acc

[Bernard]

If you do make one make sure it only lets you download after the uploader has been thanked maybe? .

what if they dont like the hack? yet they still had to give a "thanks"

[The XXX Devil]

And there goes the forum experience .

[[MPGH]Time]

what if they dont like the hack? yet they still had to give a "thanks"

Didn't think of it that way boh5 .

[Amkay]

Waste of time :|

One other way, but not sure if I can tell :P (Just some stuff...)
Anyway, why Dave would not approve this:

1: Lose of members. (Because they don't have to go to the site)
2: Less Activity (Because they no longer have to visit us )
3: We would not let our hacks be easy to leech by using the tool.
4: We just like to have it on the site

you are absolutely right. /nuffsaid

---------- Post added at 04:21 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:20 PM ----------

Waste of time :|

One other way, but not sure if I can tell :P (Just some stuff...)
Anyway, why Dave would not approve this:

1: Lose of members. (Because they don't have to go to the site)
2: Less Activity (Because they no longer have to visit us )
3: We would not let our hacks be easy to leech by using the tool.
4: We just like to have it on the site

you are absolutely right. /nuffsaid

[Snake]

I think its a great idea.

[[MPGH]Austin]

So, pretty much our idea. Even though it's kinda inactive.

MPGH CF | Facebook