Artificial Intelligence in out lifetime?

[[MPGH]arunforce]

I imagine as soon as we can fully map a brain and run simulations of the interactions between neurons well be a huge step closer.
Then we can print "neurons" onto a holographic substrate and use lasers and shit to simulate the electrical stimulation between the neurons.

I don't think it's that simple. We can relatively do something like that for something such as a mouse, but there's a bit more than just neurons and synapses that make the brain tick.

[Gragodine]

I don't think it's that simple. We can relatively do something like that for something such as a mouse, but there's a bit more than just neurons and synapses that make the brain tick.

Im pretty sure its synapses and neurons.
There has to be some sort of "firmware" that comes pre installed on all brains so that neurons know how to develop and interact with each other.
If we can map this "Firmware" it wouldn't take much to plug that into a simulation.
But brain scanning on the neural level is years away -_-

[Alen]

Im pretty sure its synapses and neurons.
There has to be some sort of "firmware" that comes pre installed on all brains so that neurons know how to develop and interact with each other.
If we can map this "Firmware" it wouldn't take much to plug that into a simulation.
But brain scanning on the neural level is years away -_-

I'm not so sure about the "years away" part, and I'm definitely not sure we'll be able to match the complexity of our brain within 10 years. I haven't checked predictions lately but I remember hearing the number 40-50 years time. Now of course you don't need to match the _human_ brain to achieve the complexity for an AI, after all pretty much every would agree that "lesser" animals have intelligence, right?

Regardless, 10 years isn't enough last time I checked and even once we hit the processing power barrier we still have the problem of defining intelligence and artificial intelligence, the problem of creating one and the problem of possibly maintaining one if ever created.

[Blitz]

Well, the intelligence level it's at is quite high because you didn't understand that he's meaning robots, terminators, and/or many different forms of AI. Not regular AI.

I understood what he meant, but that's not what he said.

[Azathᴏth]

I'm not so sure about the "years away" part, and I'm definitely not sure we'll be able to match the complexity of our brain within 10 years. I haven't checked predictions lately but I remember hearing the number 40-50 years time. Now of course you don't need to match the _human_ brain to achieve the complexity for an AI, after all pretty much every would agree that "lesser" animals have intelligence, right?

Regardless, 10 years isn't enough last time I checked and even once we hit the processing power barrier we still have the problem of defining intelligence and artificial intelligence, the problem of creating one and the problem of possibly maintaining one if ever created.

Asimov's 3 laws of robotics. kkkkkkkkk

[noob555]

Not possible in 10 years, 50-100 years though is realistic. Assuming we don't destroy the earth by then.
Maybe something like jarvis from iron man in the next 10 years maybe possible though o.O

[Gragodine]

Not possible in 10 years, 50-100 years though is realistic. Assuming we don't destroy the earth by then.
Maybe something like jarvis from iron man in the next 10 years maybe possible though o.O

Maybe. Still crossing my fingers for something more cortana like though lol.

[Inquisition]

Yes. Scientists are already close so..

[Azathᴏth]

Yes. Scientists are already close so..

No they're not.

[[MPGH]Psychotic]

I understood what he meant, but that's not what he said.

I agree. He could have been more specific, but this is general. What do you expect? .

[Xipher2.0]

I am pure AI, so what are you talking about?

[Tall kiwi]

In my opinion, I don't believe that A.I can exist... as in, having robots act and think like humans with their own self control etc

[[MPGH]arunforce]

Im pretty sure its synapses and neurons.
There has to be some sort of "firmware" that comes pre installed on all brains so that neurons know how to develop and interact with each other.
If we can map this "Firmware" it wouldn't take much to plug that into a simulation.
But brain scanning on the neural level is years away -_-

Well it's definitely not that simple, a "firmware" isn't the only thing holding us back, the brain is a complex object, certain regions harbor certain things, and function differently from mammal to mammal. If it was just all synapses and neurons, we wouldn't be the apex intellectual of the mammals, there are mammals with brains far larger than ours. You can't just inject a stem cell of brain matter into the brain and regrow it with full function back, since you already have the "firmware" (AHAHHHAHAHA FRINGE AHAHAHAHHAA, yah fku ratlen), or just steal someone's else's brain and become twice as smart. Shit just don't work like that, there's consciousness, dreaming, and hundreds of other things that are unexplained about the brain.

[The Cop King]

i have no idea what you're talking about.

[[MPGH]arunforce]

In my opinion, I don't believe that A.I can exist... as in, having robots act and think like humans with their own self control etc

Well, they have self control, moving an arm is self control. If you're talking about self awareness, that's totally different and not a requirement to be called A.I. That's called a true A.I., but as unlikely as it seems, who really knows, not everything is as complex as it seems.