Is CA Checking bytes before you respawn?

[Password77]

Hmm I go thru 1 and 2 seconds just fine but the trouble is when I am about to respawn, I crash. This only happens when I am using memory hacks. Is it that CA is checking Bytes before respawn or is it just my memory method O.o

[iAllure]

They're checking for hacks on each respawn, easy way around this is not using memory hacks or just get a bypass like @Ch40zz-C0d3r and I

[Password77]

They're checking for hacks on each respawn, easy way around this is not using memory hacks or just get a bypass like @Ch40zz-C0d3r and I

Makes sense. I know exactly what to do. No need big of a bypass for this just need a small method

[Ch40zz-C0d3r]

Haha you all will fail...
Sorry if this seems bad from me but its the truth!

[matypatty]

They're checking for hacks on each respawn, easy way around this is not using memory hacks or just get a bypass like @Ch40zz-C0d3r and I

derp

if (dead)
haxors off
else
haxors on

[J]

derp

if (dead)
haxors off
else
haxors on

Lmao, derps will be derps. It's honestly not that hard lmfao...

[Herpina]

derp

if (dead)
haxors off
else
haxors on

no just no.... now we have bunch of stupid leeched and copy pasta'd publics

[Password77]

uhh
bool checkifdead(){
if dead
return ture;
else
return false O.o}
thats what i mean

derp

if (dead)
haxors off
else
haxors on

---------- Post added at 07:49 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:48 PM ----------

Haha you all will fail...
Sorry if this seems bad from me but its the truth!

How is making a method to check if dead fail? Do you realize how big of a "fail" you are to make a bypass instead of small check? O.o

[matypatty]

uhh
bool checkifdead(){
if dead
return ture;
else
return false O.o}
thats what i mean

---------- Post added at 07:49 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:48 PM ----------


How is making a method to check if dead fail? Do you realize how big of a "fail" you are to make a bypass instead of small check? O.o

if (local health <= 0)
hacks off
else
hacks on

you don't need to make a function out of it.

and I doubt he bypassed the check which would have been a waste of time, probably just restoring bytes when dead

[Password77]

if (local health <= 0)
hacks off
else
hacks on

you don't need to make a function out of it.

and I doubt he bypassed the check which would have been a waste of time, probably just restoring bytes when dead

True but i guess making a method cleans up the code a bit but oh well. And I have no clue why in the world he would be making a bypass for the check lol.

[Ch40zz-C0d3r]

True but i guess making a method cleans up the code a bit but oh well. And I have no clue why in the world he would be making a bypass for the check lol.

Should I say so?
This shit is atm just when you respawn.
They can do this every second or every frame. I wanna see you using this method then.

[matypatty]

Should I say so?
This shit is atm just when you respawn.
They can do this every second or every frame. I wanna see you using this method then.

that would affect the games performance quite a lot.
if the time comes when they do decide to do this, which I do not expect to be any time soon, I would look into a real bypass.

[Password77]

ILY no homo

that would affect the games performance quite a lot.
if the time comes when they do decide to do this, which I do not expect to be any time soon, I would look into a real bypass.

---------- Post added at 11:02 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:01 AM ----------

Should I say so?
This shit is atm just when you respawn.
They can do this every second or every frame. I wanna see you using this method then.

If they do so, my laptop won't handle to run Combat Arms therefore, I quit .

[Departure]

thanks for this info about them checking each respawn..... When did they start doing this?

[arun823]

thanks for this info about them checking each respawn..... When did they start doing this?

Since the last patch