Judaism was around thousands of years before Christianity and Islam. Jesus was a jew and muhammed was mad that a few jews bullied him so he made religious text revolving around hating jews. /thread
The age difference is 78 years. It did happen that men got to live that long, but that would be as rare as our 120-130 year old grannies today.
Religion is retarded in every way, but that does not mean that the people who got tricked into believing it or who were forced into believing it should suffer if they are doing nothing wrong, and they shouldn't be bashed with stuff that were made up. @Aborted
He proved it by showing verses and other proof. Yes, you might say that the book and the religion is bullshit and not sufficient proof, but if they are using the book to create those prototypes, then why should he not use the same source to prove them wrong?
---------- Post added at 03:17 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:17 PM ----------
He is not proving any religion wrong, he is proving the prototypes wrong. WATCH THE VIDEO!!!
Judaism was around thousands of years before Christianity and Islam. Jesus was a jew and muhammed was mad that a few jews bullied him so he made religious text revolving around hating jews. /thread
He said something about how the US kills children and women in the middle east, yet those terrorists use childs as their own soldiers and defenses.
Actually, the Islam OBVIOUSLY notes out there that any hate thrown towards any religion out there(without being attacked first, either verbally or physically)is forbidden.
It also says that you should respect the Jews and Christians as the Quran points out in the most obvious ways.
First off this was already posted by some dimwit raghead in the debate section.
Secondly this guy tries to pass speculation for facts way too much for me to take him serious.
Opposed to some of the other Imam's and generally ignorant Muslim shit nozzles I've seen try to sell the "religion of peace" he's not bad though.
Last edited by Ethereal; 07-10-2013 at 03:31 PM.
Yes he can.
Lets just say that you read a book, and I read it.
I read it carefully and thoroughly, while you read it quickly, and interpretate some things wrong.
Then what you say about the book could be taken as a fact, but as I would have read it thoroughly, and interpretate things the right way, then I could indeed prove you wrong.
That is whats going on here. He is proving the religious people who are trying to prove the others wrong, wrong. It is really logic, but to you and me, it sounds like plain bullshit.
I'm an atheist, so I think both of them are full of shit.
Let me stop you right there. A personal opinion is not equal to facts.
No matter if I read a book fast and you read it thoroughly.
Everyone perceives it differently.
And you can't prove religion as fact no matter how hard you try, unless you can snap a picture of it or somehow show them that "god exists".
Which is "impossible".
It's all a matter of how people choose to see the world or how they believe things.
It's a personal preference, nothing more.
Gray (07-10-2013)