Historical proofs of Muhammad married Aisha when she was 18

[Coituz]

You know, its about time we ended this.

Do you believe in the Hadith? Yes or no?

--------

The sources you listed are actually less valid than testimony from Aisha and writing from people of the time*(hadith). It being based 600 years later and with majority of the islamic community already agreeing on this subject(due to the many Islamic sources), its almost silly for us to argue that the hadith are valid when it is already accepted by the Muslim community.
---------------------------


SO either tell me that you don't believe in the Hadith or that you do. None of this "it could be right it could not be" that's just trying to be ignorant.

I do believe in the hadith most of the times when it is correct , Hadith can be wrong and can be right . (all of us human)
Just say that you were owned in the history and don't try to lie , bringing up scholars , hadith and Qur'an verses to prove for you that she wasn't 9 , bringing for you the history that she wasn't 9 and in both ways you still refusing the facts.

[Empire]

I do believe in the hadith most of the times when it is correct , Hadith can be wrong and can be right . (all of us human)
Just say that you were owned in the history and don't try to lie , bringing up scholars , hadith and Qur'an verses to prove for you that she wasn't 9 , bringing for you the history that she wasn't 9 and in both ways you still refusing the facts.

You either do or you don't.

If you select what you believe and don't, on basic history, then you don't.


Nuff said /thread.