Muhammad isn't pedophile .......

[Implify]

That Muhammad is a pedo.

Also allah.

You may be referring to OP.

[Euphemistic]

You may be referring to OP.

Let's say both .

[[MPGH]Doc]

Sorry OP but your argument doesn't stand up to scrutiny.
Was Muhammad a Pedophile?

[Plutonsvea]

i bet you didnt read shit, great, another atheist.
Y U NO BAN THEM DAVE

Somehow I don't think banning all the athiests would work out too well.

[Coituz]

Sorry OP but your argument doesn't stand up to scrutiny.
Was Muhammad a Pedophile?

This isn't a proof , there wasn't any proof to prove that he was. But I did.
Also I'm not going to reply to some kids who don't respect others.

[Gray]

This isn't a proof , there wasn't any proof to prove that he was. But I did.
Also I'm not going to reply to some kids who don't respect others.

I get what this is leaning at, he didn't ever exist and the book is all made up?

[Coituz]

I get what this is leaning at, he didn't ever exist and the book is all made up?

Again and again there is a difference between hadith and Qur'an , Qur'an isn't wrong and If It was even mentioned I would believe it but It is in a hadith which can be wrong and can be right .

[Gray]

Again and again there is a difference between hadith and Qur'an , Qur'an isn't wrong and If It was even mentioned I would believe it but It is in a hadith which can be wrong and can be right .

The difference is that they are made up from two different types of paper and has different covers?

[Coituz]

The difference is that they are made up from two different types of paper and has different covers?

Hadith is prophet's words and should be done under what he is talking about .
Qur'an is Allah's words and MUST be done.

The hadith is narrated by who heard it , the narrator can be a liar and can be wrong (but not liar) , depends in how they choose the hadith. The narrator narrates the hadith then the other narrator narrates the hadith which was narrated by the first and etc....

[Gray]

Hadith is prophet's words and should be done under what he is talking about .
Qur'an is Allah's words and MUST be done.

The hadith is narrated by who heard it , the narrator can be a liar and can be wrong (but not liar) , depends in how they choose the hadith. The narrator narrates the hadith then the other narrator narrates the hadith which was narrated by the first and etc....

So, why would you have a book of lies together a book of rules.

[Coituz]

So, why would you have a book of lies together a book of rules.

I didn't mean liar exactly I meant wrong and something that is weak(I don't know cant explain the meaning lol).

[[MPGH]Doc]

This isn't a proof , there wasn't any proof to prove that he was. But I did.
Also I'm not going to reply to some kids who don't respect others.

Cool. I provide an article that legitimately tries to refute your claim (and succeeds) and you can't even respect that by providing a rebuttal. You just dismiss my post and claim yours to be "proof". You wonder why so many people hate Muslims? Just look at yourself in the mirror. What you will see is ignorance personified, but you'd just be too ignorant to see that anyway.

[Coituz]

Cool. I provide an article that legitimately tries to refute your claim (and succeeds) and you can't even respect that by providing a rebuttal. You just dismiss my post and claim yours to be "proof". You wonder why so many people hate Muslims? Just look at yourself in the mirror. What you will see is ignorance personified, but you'd just be too ignorant to see that anyway.

I don't even care if all of MPGH hates me or they think I'm ignorant , what I care about is If I'm in the right way or not and what I'm thinking in. My rebuttal is the same as the topic's first post which is the history , you can "refute" it due to the "topic's" main "words" . You can say that you mentioned a wrong date in the history and she was 9 years old by proving it with "history" or any verses in the Qur'an. I looked to myself and I've never seen anything wrong in what I said.

[[MPGH]Doc]

I don't even care if all of MPGH hates me or they think I'm ignorant , what I care about is If I'm in the right way or not and what I'm thinking in. My rebuttal is the same as the topic's first post which is the history , you can "refute" it due to the "topic's" main "words" . You can say that you mentioned a wrong date in the history and she was 9 years old by proving it with "history" or any verses in the Qur'an. I looked to myself and I've never seen anything wrong in what I said.

What is the point in posting if you're so sure that you are right? You don't even take the time to read an alternate view. What makes you the authority on Islam?

[Coituz]

What is the point in posting if you're so sure that you are right? You don't even take the time to read an alternate view. What makes you the authority on Islam?

I did read it . I'm sure that I'm right because It is a "proof".