Blacklist usertag for Blacklisted users?

[[MPGH]Doc]

I don't think it should be a tag. Instead it should be a usergroup colour along with subtext.

[Gaydow]

I don't think it should be a tag. Instead it should be a usergroup colour along with subtext.

I agree with the colour but I think there needs to be the user tag as well since they stand out more and first thing I look for on a persons post is there user tag I never ever look for a sub text but it can be added there also.

Edit: And btw guys I have more ideas too but idk if they matter and @Symmetrical do you remember when I talked about the minimum 100 posts to buy in Combat Arms Selling/Trading/Buying what have you thought of that, you said you were going to think about it?

[Josh]

I don't think it should be a tag. Instead it should be a usergroup colour along with subtext.

So their name would be like orange (the color of an in-mate's clothing) and have [NO][STB] (Selling/Trading/Buying).

Say, if I were put onto the Blacklist, my name would should up as [NO]Wassabi?[STB] ?

[Sheep]

So their name would be like orange (the color of an in-mate's clothing) and have [NO][STB] (Selling/Trading/Buying).

Say, if I were put onto the Blacklist, my name would should up as [NO]Wassabi?[STB]?

Good good


NOT ORANGE DOE



Also +1

[Predator]

I support. This tag should be placed on the account if they are on a Blacklisted IP.

[Plutonsvea]

I support this.
Either that, or your avatar gets replaced with a smaller one saying "BLACKLISTED FROM MARKETPLACE" in bold.

[Pepsi Cola]

I have a better idea. We give them that black user title with silver writing and this


EDIT: But if we were to implement it they should have all the CS disadvantages such as smaller AVI small name like "[SCAM]Pepsi Cola"

[Josh]

I have a better idea. We give them that black user title with silver writing and this

A Blacklist doesn't constitute as a website Ban, with the exception of the Marketplace.

[Pepsi Cola]

A Blacklist doesn't constitute as a website Ban, with the exception of the Marketplace.

Well I thought scamming was a Ban'able offence.

[Jim]

Giving them a tag would just make people want to get it, therefore increase scamming. E.g. Cock Sucker, the ******s that try to get into it.

As other people have stated, username color that someone would fucking hate like grey and then a bolded user title saying Blacklisted.

[[MPGH]Doc]

So their name would be like orange (the color of an in-mate's clothing) and have [NO][STB] (Selling/Trading/Buying).

Say, if I were put onto the Blacklist, my name would should up as [NO]Wassabi?[STB] ?

Nahh, too much like nigboi's.

I mean the text underneath username. Have it set permanently to KNOWN SCAMMER, or something like that. Removes the need to make a new tag, removes any kind of tag hunter (trust me, there will be tag hunters), also if the subtext is bigger than the username, then it becomes easy to identify.

[Gray]

Me being a jerk about everything and all has its glory.
But this is a pretty good idea if you don't think about the tag hunters, but just include a long ban as well before allowing them back.
Make sure it's an ugly tag so nobody wants it. Sort of like cocksucker except you get a 1x1 avatar or something.

Make it unattractive and it should be good.

[Mauled]

But if they have scammed shouldn't they be permed ?? or is it more of a Trade with Caution similar to what is implemented on Sy**e

[Gray]

They would have been perm'd, yes.
However, some are allowed back on after filing a dispute.

At least that's how I have seen it go down, but I might be mistaken.

[Ryzeros.]

Pretty good idea.