My graphics guy

[blazeitclint]

Looks kind of low quality.

[Fucking Moron]

@Transferred
Way to basic
IT just jumps from a loop frame and does different effects.
Try to let him know to work on more depth, and that color scheme (cringe af)
No offense it's just not appealing

[Chimpthecrip]

Pretty basic and messy

[MrFray]

Good jobs

[Reaky]

It fair .

[ScriMz-]

Looks pretty low end.

[CrimsonsDesign]

The second one is decent, the others are just really plain with no real detail.

[wipedout1]

I feel like I need to get to know him as a person before I can judge him, maybe those designs have deeper subliminal meanings that lead back to his childhood. How could we know?

[DerHelixx]

I'm not a 3D expert by any means however:

The intro is way too bouncy, during that time i could barely read what was written.

The 2nd image's text is too hard to read.
The background are two fractals and one stock smashed together, poor work.
The 3D shards are good however they are low quality, which ruing their purpose.

The third image is just a K letter which has given depth, he added a metallic material and the yellow outlines, not much to see.

As for the last one, the only thing i like is the tip of the owl's right tip (at top left corner).
The background has no reason to exist.
The rest of the owl doesn't look appealing at all.
The text is absolutely atrocious, especially the font.


Does that answer the OP's question? =)

I totaly agree!

[ydocsmada]

Looks like one of those stock intros you can buy.

[Fucking Moron]

This is all simple and basic stuff done in cinema 4d @Transferred
Intro way to bouncy blurred and to much green like a ton to much

Overall all pieces is about 5.5/10

Favorite is the OR logo