Originally Posted by Brizingir
light source is under him and also above the hammer 
Welcome back
Welcome back
Originally Posted by Brizingir
B&W Sig | Destroyer
Originally Posted by Brizingir
a bit ya, in the B&W yA
I think the focal needed to be bigger. This is because by nature our eye is automatically drawn to the head, and because of the size this is difficult and reduces the pieces aesthetic quality. The effects are good, although some parts are too contrasted compared to the rest of the piece. I also think the text needs a reworking.
For the effects, as a general rule, if the focal is dark use darker effects, if the focal is bright then you can use contrasting effects.
For the effects, as a general rule, if the focal is dark use darker effects, if the focal is bright then you can use contrasting effects.
thanx for cnc
Hmm it's nice. But it has a weird feeling.
Prolly cuz the colors of the guy really don't match the colors of the bg and the rest of the sig.
The light is alsow a bit disturbing in my opinion. There are multible light sources which make my eye want to go to them all, which is pritty disturbing. The depth is good. The BG is nice, to abd it doesn't really match with the render. I can't really say soemthin about the flow, I think it's not to good, but not sure. Like I can't really find out if there is flow -.-
The text is good, nic ecolours font and good placement.
Allover it's not a bad sig. But no "wow-factor".
Looks pritty simple. Could use some more effects.
6/10. C.
Prolly cuz the colors of the guy really don't match the colors of the bg and the rest of the sig.
The light is alsow a bit disturbing in my opinion. There are multible light sources which make my eye want to go to them all, which is pritty disturbing. The depth is good. The BG is nice, to abd it doesn't really match with the render. I can't really say soemthin about the flow, I think it's not to good, but not sure. Like I can't really find out if there is flow -.-
The text is good, nic ecolours font and good placement.
Allover it's not a bad sig. But no "wow-factor".
Looks pritty simple. Could use some more effects.
6/10. C.
Originally Posted by CVendetta
Hmm it's nice. But it has a weird feeling.
Prolly cuz the colors of the guy really don't match the colors of the bg and the rest of the sig.
The light is alsow a bit disturbing in my opinion. There are multible light sources which make my eye want to go to them all, which is pritty disturbing. The depth is good. The BG is nice, to abd it doesn't really match with the render. I can't really say soemthin about the flow, I think it's not to good, but not sure. Like I can't really find out if there is flow -.-
The text is good, nic ecolours font and good placement.
Allover it's not a bad sig. But no "wow-factor".
Looks pritty simple. Could use some more effects.
6/10. C.
Prolly cuz the colors of the guy really don't match the colors of the bg and the rest of the sig.
The light is alsow a bit disturbing in my opinion. There are multible light sources which make my eye want to go to them all, which is pritty disturbing. The depth is good. The BG is nice, to abd it doesn't really match with the render. I can't really say soemthin about the flow, I think it's not to good, but not sure. Like I can't really find out if there is flow -.-
The text is good, nic ecolours font and good placement.
Allover it's not a bad sig. But no "wow-factor".
Looks pritty simple. Could use some more effects.
6/10. C.
I have to disagree with some of the other posts,
i don't like this.
The render completely clashes with the background, the blending is good but it just doesn't look right.
6/10
i don't like this.
The render completely clashes with the background, the blending is good but it just doesn't look right.
6/10
