CoD has a lot of deficiencies but makes up for it by being mindlessly addictive. (being an arcade game)
Bf3 is the better game among the two, more so if it was tailored like an arcade game
If you suck ass in most games, they will suck for you.
[IMG]https://i143.photobucke*****m/albums/r135/xSpartan_117x/ChiefPwnage.gif[/IMG]
CoD has a lot of deficiencies but makes up for it by being mindlessly addictive. (being an arcade game)
Bf3 is the better game among the two, more so if it was tailored like an arcade game
Last edited by magnitude8; 04-14-2012 at 11:49 AM.
i love battlefield 3. made your day?
I honestly don't understand how you could compare these two games. CoD is just infantry battles, BF3 has better infantry battles, plus vehicles and planes.
Its like comparing a VCR to a playstation 3 with a built in blue ray DVD player. The only thing the VCR has is originality, but that doesn't count for much if the movies are shit and the people who watch them are children, compared to more advanced blue ray system. Which by the way you can watch those childish movies in better quality for the children.
Although mw3 is a run and shoot bf3 has alot of noobs that dont understand teamwork and i die 24/7 and now i am happily hacking the bf3 servers if only battlefield games were like bad company 2 again...
This shit is still going on? I thought we established the fact the Bf3 is clearly better.
Bulletdrop ftw!
“Those who control the past, control the future: who controls the present controls the past” ~ George Orwell
Its me, Dreamgun