-HJ (01-24-2016),[MPGH]AVGN (01-24-2016),Eternity (01-24-2016),[MPGH]Hova (01-24-2016)
-HJ (01-24-2016),[MPGH]AVGN (01-24-2016),Eternity (01-24-2016),[MPGH]Hova (01-24-2016)
I fear for our future, i know so many kids here in Cali under 30 that are not only on the Sanders train but think socialism is a good thing.
[MPGH]Hova (01-24-2016)
Dumb and exaggerated.
imo
S-A-D B-O-Y-S
Bitch, I grind, bitch, I grind
[MPGH]arunforce (01-24-2016),[MPGH]Disturbed (01-24-2016),RadioactiveBiohazard (01-28-2016)
Do the world a favor and off yourself, please.
Thankfully you're probably to young to vote.
Do not go gentle into that good night,
Old age should burn and rave at close of day;
Rage, rage against the dying of the light.
kinda exaggerated but definitely exposes something
I'm going to assume that you also want creationism taught in schools, right?
The shit you're bitching about is literally how our tax system already works and has worked for many, many years. It also isn't redistributing iphones or some bullshit, it is making sure people don't die of cancer or starve to death because they can't get a job due to the market or a disability. The right wing rhetoric about the socialists coming to put you in the poor house is an absurd scare tactic designed to keep the masses poor and the rich untouchable.
"Oh no, I will only be able to take 20 international vacations a year instead of 21, damn those poor people and their hunger! They don't deserve to eat if they can't be successful like me, and get a small $1M loan from their parents! I want my 21st vacation!"
Nope I'm 18.
I'm actually agnostic, and I don't believe in creationism lmao. I do not agree with Bernie Sanders making his campaign about making everything "free" for everyone. The idea of socialism is absolutely stupid. Nothing is "free", somebody has to pay for it. I don't want to be helping some 16 year old girl shitting out a baby every year and then having to pay for their food and housing. You're shit out of luck if your mother was an idiot and had 5+ kids at 16 years old, blame her, don't blame society. There's a thing called natural selection, maybe you should learn about it. I have no problem taxing the filthy rich more, however I do have a problem with us paying for entitlement programs for the poor. There is no such thing as not being able to get a job anymore, if you can't get a job you're just downright fucking lazy. We're not in a recession anymore, stop making excuses for the lazy.
There's a difference between not letting people starve and giving them free iPhones, or letting them die of an infection that could be cured with $20 of antibiotics.
Bernie doesn't want everyone to have tons of free shit. That not feasible. He doesn't want people to die or suffer needlessly. I'm not saying give all the poor steaks or veal, iphones, TVs and a big house. NOBODY is saying that. Poor should have access to a basic sustenance and healthcare. Enough to survive but not to live.
People like me (and bernie) don't want to make everything even. We want to stop suffering by those who are able to and willing to work but can't find any, and by those who are disabled and can't work.
This is a decent - if a few years out dated - explanation of the wealth distribution in this country:
Also a side note: the company logo you have as your avatar? They are the most profitable company in America, and they pay less than 1% in taxes - Meanwhile I made $21k of taxable income, and paid 11% in 2015 after my refund. Now, I'm a single guy in the military. I'm perfectly fine paying 11%. I'm also a software developer, and the average pay for someone in my position as a civilian is roughly $70k - $85k. I'd be paying around 30% as a single guy when I get out after you include all taxes.
Last edited by Disturbed; 01-24-2016 at 11:38 AM.
Aborted (01-24-2016),[MPGH]arunforce (01-24-2016)
Last edited by Disturbed; 01-24-2016 at 11:40 AM.
Dude redistributes kids' Halloween candy
[MPGH]AVGN (01-24-2016)
First of all, that would be communism.
Secondly, Sanders isn't a Socialist, he doesn't believe in wealth redistribution, but merely that the very rich actually pay their fair share of taxes.
Thirdly, this example doesn't work at all, because it fails to take into account the scale of the inequality, and the actual gravity of the result. Even if his viewpoint were direct wealth redistribution, the child with the A wouldn't even be affected, even a child with a 500% grade wouldn't be affected.
Those it would effect would instead have a 10,000,000% grade, that would be lowered to a 1,000,000% grade.
Childish misinformation, and an egregious bending of the facts.
I rate this shitty meme a 0/10.
Last edited by Aborted; 01-24-2016 at 01:50 PM.
You were seeking strength, justice, splendour.
You were seeking love.
Here is the pit, here is your pit.
Its name is Silence..