kingofproz (10-06-2015)
Uhm...... well 2 things.
1. Iraq and all those casualties, were not done in 4 days. The gulf war was won very quickly, but that was a different war than the one you are thinking of.
2. The US can beat ISIS, in fact most nations could. The problem is more political than force, as you might have noticed the US isn't at full-war with ISIS.
And personally there is two points I'd like to address as to why/whynot defeat ISIS from the US perspective.
1. The US shouldbecause it's the humane thing to do. ISIS is clearly out of control, it needs to be stopped.
2. The US shouldn't because every fucking time we help the US helps the middle east, they gain nothing.
So when you say "the USA is ISIS" I think you don't understand those words.
ISIS operates independently of US authority. ISIS is comprised of muslims. There is no US military support of ISIS and it's pretty fucking stupid to think so.
i hope to living fuck you're joking with us
America can wipe out ISIS literally any time they want, but they'd gain nothing but a waste of tax dollars. If they do attack us, then we go to war with them, fucking North Korea could probably take out ISIS.
Literally Iraqi soldiers dropped their weapons and ran away when ISIS initially started attacking straight after the US spent years after 9/11 to train them to prevent terrorism in their countries. What would we gain by keeping U.S soldiers on the ground in Iraq and Afghanistan for nearly a decade and a half, with thousands of casualties, after 9/11 happened and then just attacking what we spent time on?
Last edited by Hunter Jr.; 10-03-2015 at 03:16 PM.
its actually weird . obama said he is going to fight isis and terminate it in 10 years within those airstrikes he is doing (the airstrikes are a totall bulshit) the russian strikes killed and took down much more important targets and loot for isis in 3 days than the whole american lead operation . Yes he could end isis if he stopped supporting countries who spend money on isis
1. Provide me with proof.
2. https://www.theguardian.com/world/201...-us-air-strike
Provide proof.
Russia has given ISIS weapons for money. They're entirely focused on their own government and military power.
Proof ? ..
USA has been striking for a whole year . tell me what happened ? ISIS only grew stronger , no actual shit .
Russia is striking for 1 week already . https://www.r*****m/news/318122-russi...ry-syria-isis/
- - - Updated - - -
They actually lunched rockets 1500km away and they took down the target while USA ''mistakenly'' bombed Doctors withoutborders
You didn't even disprove his point. You're trying to disprove his claim with another claim.
You didn't even source it, plus social media and ISIS promoting Muslims across the world to join out-matches the airstrikes that take out a few hundred.
Wrong !!!..
“I don't care if you're black, white, straight, bisexual, gay, lesbian, short, tall, fat, skinny, rich or poor. If you're nice to me, I'll be nice to you. Simple as that.”
Last edited by Devil; 10-16-2015 at 05:03 AM.
“I don't care if you're black, white, straight, bisexual, gay, lesbian, short, tall, fat, skinny, rich or poor. If you're nice to me, I'll be nice to you. Simple as that.”