Prototype Sig, CnC

[ShadowPwnz]

What do you think? I'm fairly new to this, so tips are appreciated.

[ImaGFX]

second its much better; speccially better q. both are nice.

[Trianglez]

Pretty dark, can't see anything that well. Not sure abou the blending because it's too dark, it's alright though just here's a huge tip. NEVER use lens flare as a lighting source. It just won't work out for begginers.

[serpentine]

Are you talking about the tag in his sig or the one in his post? There is only lens flare lighting in his sig. As for the one in his post. You should bring out the focal more and the text. Gray text on gray doesn't work out too well.

[Trianglez]

Yeah I didnt notice it was his sig and not the one he posted, I thought he posted both, I was on my phone at the time, It looks different.

[serpentine]

Yeah.. =/ You did a good job with depth. I also see that you tried to make like a blood on the wall effect? To me it looks like there is glass in front of the wall and the blood is on that. You should work on that as well.

[Trianglez]

Oh thats what it was? Anyway, Id just scrap the sig and stick with your soldier one.

[serpentine]

Yeah, I wonder how me made that one it looks way better.

[Trianglez]

I think he got someone else to make it.

[serpentine]

Or followed a tutorial completely

[Trianglez]

Doesnt look like his style.

Also, the sig says, loob behind you. :/

[serpentine]

Which one the first or second one? The second one is better that is why I think he followed a tutorial to do it.

[ShadowPwnz]

@trianglez It does say look, but it seems to be cut off by the border.
@serpentine second one came first, and I did follow a tutorial pretty much completely(except text and lens flare)

I personally would've thought the first one looked better, because I don't like the amount of empty space in the second one.