Regarding mods that are [18+]

[InCognito]

Stop making threads about how we should ban them and not let people release. It is their work, and it is nothing against the rules, so they HAVE the right to release it, whether you may like it or not. The best thing for you to do is IGNORE IT, because complaining about them and making threads asking to ban them isn't gonna do a single thing. And BTW, if you're label me as a perverted user, don't, because I don't like them either but what you guys are doing isn't helping but making it worse.

[-Madara_Uchihã-]

Jew Gay? /

Na I kid. I support this. If you dont like it, Ignore it

[iProcrastinate]

Ofcourse,
they act like the creaters of the 18+ are shoving their Mods into their CA folder themseleves -.-
i just dont really care for them.
so in the words Gambit and Distinct,
If you dont like it, Ignore it. /yea

[Ali]

If you're under 18 ; you're not even supposed to click it .

[noob555]

WORD ALIXL AND SOSO
IF U UNDER 18 U CANT CLICK IT U LITTLE NUBS
>:O

[HoboMaster]

But I clicked it
/

[Ali]

WORD ALIXL AND SOSO
IF U UNDER 18 U CANT CLICK IT U LITTLE NUBS
>:O

It's our job to approve it

[Gitorla]

It's our job to approve it

you made me lol

anyways, I support this aswell.

but i think that there is a limit.. I like my mod, but not a mod where i see a girl something in her privates..

whoever supported at the thread AVGN made and supports here aswell, i call gay.

[Wax.]

And it is nothing against the rules, so they HAVE the right to release it.

Now I am not going after you directly Distinct but.


Inside that I do believe it says Sexually-Orientated, and Obscene.

Some of the mods that are people posted are Sexually-Orientated, and very obscene.

So that being said, isn't that braking the main rules agents the forum its self?

EDIT:
And if you really want to get into this, Violating any Laws, Copy Righting martial that isn't yours is a federal crime.

[-Madara_Uchihã-]

Now I am not going after you directly Distinct but.


Inside that I do believe it says Sexually-Orientated, and Obscene. .

MPGH has the right to change that. And if they give us Permission to Post as long as we put [18+] /yea

[Wax.]

MPGH has the right to change that. And if they give us Permission to Post as long as we put [18+] /yea

True, I don't know I have dropped it I am just stating facts, but there are a lot of counter-reactions to all of this.

[InCognito]

Now I am not going after you directly Distinct but.


Inside that I do believe it says Sexually-Orientated, and Obscene.

Some of the mods that are people posted are Sexually-Orientated, and very obscene.

So that being said, isn't that braking the main rules agents the forum its self?

EDIT:
And if you really want to get into this, Violating any Laws, Copy Righting martial that isn't yours is a federal crime.

By putting [18+] in the title, MPGH is no longer responsible for people under the age of 18 who has went into the thread.

[Nexulous]

Now I am not going after you directly Distinct but.


Inside that I do believe it says Sexually-Orientated, and Obscene.

Some of the mods that are people posted are Sexually-Orientated, and very obscene.

So that being said, isn't that braking the main rules agents the forum its self?

EDIT:
And if you really want to get into this, Violating any Laws, Copy Righting martial that isn't yours is a federal crime.

Your spelling is like, epic fail.
Theres nothing anyone can do about it.
As well as the fact that it is a users preference,
You can't stop people from doing these things, either for fun or for pleasure.

[[MPGH]KING]

As long as there adding 18+ in there title. By all means fine. But if there just editing the login screen. It should'nt be approved. But that may come in the future.

[Wax.]

Your spelling is like, epic fail.
Theres nothing anyone can do about it.
As well as the fact that it is a users preference,
You can't stop people from doing these things, either for fun or for pleasure.

My spelling isn't important to me, as I have said before if spell check does not fine it wrong then it is correct to me, if you look at it in a different way then to bad.

@Distinct
-That is true, that should be put inside the agreement, however I am done with this conversation, whats there is there, it is for the site admins and staff to consider what has been said and 80% change nothing will happen considering its been that way for a long time.