Ok I'm going to repeat this because you're still not getting it. Evolution is not dependent on abiogensis. It doesn't matter how abiogenesis occurred, it has no impact on the validity of evolution. Much like how the origin of the universe doesn't impact the validity of general relativity.
"We swallow greedily any lie that flatters us, but we sip only little by little at a truth we find bitter." ~ Denis Diderot
But how can you make an omelet without an egg? Or in your terms how can evolution occur if a cell cannot come from non living matter? I understand the evolution part but i don't believe the earth is over 1 billion years old and even if i did you can't have evolution w/ out a cell
All I can say is all you Atheist idiots will see the truth when judgement day comes. I feel for you. Hopefully you'll get saved before then, no one deserves to burn in hell.
I'm not gonna sit here and argue with anyone, But I just hope you realize the truth before its too late.
Good luck.
Bombsaway707 (01-20-2011),Hassan (01-21-2011),WOLFPACK X69X (01-20-2011)
Then at no point are you arguing about evolution, your qualm is with abiogenesis. We don't know exactly how the first cell formed, whether it was in under-sea vents, the "soup" theory or the others that have been proposed. However what we do know due to the Miller-Urey experiments is that the building blocks for life can form from natural chemical reactions in no way tied to life. It doesn't matter that the atmosphere that was used was not the one that was on earth back at the origin of life. The Miller-Urey experiment was a proof of concept, that amino-acids can form solely through usually natural chemical reactions.
"We swallow greedily any lie that flatters us, but we sip only little by little at a truth we find bitter." ~ Denis Diderot