[CAFlames Base] AVA Hax v2.1 (Vista/7) - UNDETECTED

[kit2]

uhm... you can use old bypasses that still work, they just might not be on this site. I know that kinda sucks.

Yeah I might use 'em, if they worked. The last bypass for Gameguard I saw was 6 years old, and I don't really think that Inca would stay put for 6 years and let the bypass do its job. (it was a bypass called unprotect, not really had a name on it that, 'must be used with ***** game only')

To those who are having problems with the HACK

The detour of the hack isn't completely undetected, so please, refrain from posting rage typo comments as they'd lead you nowhere.

[Raidendeath]

think i might of found a possible bypass...a buddy of mine was working on he said to try it but all he gave me was code

[Phantazy]

Same here, nt tho CA keep em comin

[Battlefield 3]

think i might of found a possible bypass...a buddy of mine was working on he said to try it but all he gave me was code

looks like he is a coder ._.
post the code

[Raidendeath]

this is all he gave me idk how much help itll be



#define hs_jmp 0x63b31d
//needs to change (0x63b31d)

#define hs_jmp2 0x63b323
//needs to change (0x63b323)

typedef int (__cdecl *hs_getprocaddress_t)( int hmodule, int a2 );
typedef int (__stdcall *hackshieldcomm_t )( int, void*, void* );
typedef signed int (__stdcall *kickproc_t)( int a1, int a2, int a3 );

hs_getprocaddress_t phs_getprocaddress = null;
hackshieldcomm_t phackshieldcomm = null;
kickproc_t pkickproc = null;

signed int __stdcall new_kickproc( int a1, int a2, int a3 )
{
return 1;
}

int __stdcall new_hackshieldcomm( int hscommcode, void *param1, void *param2 )
{
if( hscommcode == 4 || hscommcode == 5 || hscommcode == 13 ) //kill!
{
if( hscommcode == 4 ) //replace kick proc
{
dword *dwparam1 = (dword *)param1;

pkickproc = (kickproc_t)*dwparam1;
*dwparam1 = (dword)new_kickproc;
}

int ireturn = phackshieldcomm( hscommcode, param1, param2 );

return 1;
}

int ireturn = phackshieldcomm( hscommcode, param1, param2 );

return ireturn;
}

void hookcommunication( exception_pointers* pexceptioninfo )
{
dword dwebp = pexceptioninfo->contextrecord->ebp;
dword dwparam2 = 0;

__asm
{
push eax;
push edx;
mov eax, dwebp;
mov edx, [eax+0xc];
mov dwparam2, edx;
pop edx;
pop eax;
}

if( dwparam2 == 0xa ) //this is the ordinal of some export...hmm..
{
phackshieldcomm = (hackshieldcomm_t)pexceptioninfo->contextrecord->eax;
pexceptioninfo->contextrecord->eax = (dword)new_hackshieldcomm;
}

pexceptioninfo->contextrecord->eip = hs_jmp2;

return;
}

pvoid pcontexthandler = null;

long winapi tgsexceptionhandler( exception_pointers* pexceptioninfo )
{
if( pexceptioninfo->exceptionrecord->exceptioncode != exception_single_step )
{
return exception_continue_search;
}

if( pexceptioninfo->exceptionrecord->exceptionaddress == (pvoid)hs_jmp )
{
hookcommunication( pexceptioninfo );
return exception_continue_execution;
}

return exception_continue_search;
}

void initcontexthook()
{
pcontexthandler = addvectoredexceptionhandler( 0x50be17, tgsexceptionhandler );

//needs to change (0x50be17)

context context;
contex*****ntextflags = context_debug_registers;
getthreadcontext(getcurrentthread(), &context);
context.dr0 = hs_jmp;
context.dr7 = (1<<0)|(1<<2)|(1<<4)|(1<<6);
setthreadcontext(getcurrentthread(), &context);
}

[EliteIII]

I have a question:
are these hacks for korean version or ijji version or for both....
I injected successfull, all with admin rights, tried with 4 injectors but always there appears no menu. the injectors always say injected successfull.

[Battlefield 3]

I have a question:
are these hacks for korean version or ijji version or for both....
I injected successfull, all with admin rights, tried with 4 injectors but always there appears no menu. the injectors always say injected successfull.

ITS FOR US AVA ._.

[jgjgjghack]

it only work for 1min

[Karleo]

it only work for 1min

Everybody knows, no need to post it 1000 times.

[YouKnowWhoz]

Even though I can't get this to work, I really appreciate your time making this hack! I don't understand why people are QQ'ing about the hack doesn't work, and why you made a hack that's already detectable.. I obviously don't care.. I'm just happy that you've got the time and experience to make a hack like this - It might not work right now, but really.. You've got some good talent going on there, mate .
Keep up the good work.

Sincerely,
YouKnowWhoz.

[lunken]

man it dont work

[games123]

man it dont work

HOLY SHIT why the fuck cant people read THIS HACK IS (DETECTED!!!!!)

[Battlefield 3]

HOLY SHIT why the fuck cant people read THIS HACK IS (DETECTED!!!!!)

eh because they are dumb?

[jgjgjghack]

Y it said undetected.... >=(

[Karleo]

Y it said undetected.... >=(

And if you'd actually fucking read you would find that its not.

Jesus christ this isn't rocket science.