Frostbite2 vs IW 5.0

[Noovaa]

Frostbite 2
[IMG]https://i208.photobucke*****m/albums/bb15/Exodiaj/battlefield-3-20110408004634859.jpg[/IMG]

IW 5.0
[IMG]https://i208.photobucke*****m/albums/bb15/Exodiaj/modern-warfare-2-wallpaper-5-1920x1200.jpg[/IMG]

You decide.

[Rigby]

very obvious
frostbite 2
improved and better then ever

[Fogest]

Don't be bias with the pics. Lets instead revserse this and not add anything to the battlefield pic and see how they compare:

[IMG]https://i974.photobucke*****m/albums/ae226/fogest/battlefield-3-20110408004634859.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]https://i974.photobucke*****m/albums/ae226/fogest/modern-warfare-2-wallpaper-5-1920x1200.jpg[/IMG]

I like em both when you actually take a edited mw3 pic as well

[Noovaa]

Don't be bias with the pics. Lets instead revserse this and not add anything to the battlefield pic and see how they compare:

[IMG]https://i974.photobucke*****m/albums/ae226/fogest/battlefield-3-20110408004634859.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]https://i974.photobucke*****m/albums/ae226/fogest/modern-warfare-2-wallpaper-5-1920x1200.jpg[/IMG]

I like em both when you actually take a edited mw3 pic as well

Very good, everyone has their own opinion, I'll respect that.

I'm not bias with these pics, I simple found them by googleing the name of the title of each game.

Its not my fault there is such an obvious difference in graphics between them.

[Fogest]

Very good, everyone has their own opinion, I'll respect that.

I'm not bias with these pics, I simple found them by googleing the name of the title of each game.

Its not my fault there is such an obvious difference in graphics between them.

You do understand you took a pic from a SNOW SCENE. When there is snow of course it won't be colourful. But then for battlefield you took a pic from a colourful scene.

[Noovaa]

You do understand you took a pic from a SNOW SCENE. When there is snow of course it won't be colourful. But then for battlefield you took a pic from a colourful scene.

If that's your opinion, then let me edit it to be a bit more realistic in color.

[IMG]https://i208.photobucke*****m/albums/bb15/Exodiaj/battlefield-3-20110408004634859-1.jpg[/IMG]

[IMG]https://i208.photobucke*****m/albums/bb15/Exodiaj/upload.jpg[/IMG]

[Lehsyrus]

^^ Both Modern Warfare 3. Pic one to compare if you don't like the snow level.

[Commander X]

Lets remember that the composition of a picture also the mood of it and the different hues, and shades can really make a difference to whether a picture looks good or not.

[Fogest]

Lets remember that the composition of a picture also the mood of it and the different hues, and shades can really make a difference to whether a picture looks good or not.

Exactly. You cannot compare two games by the quality of A PICTURE.

[Tick Me On]

Exactly. You cannot compare two games by the quality of A PICTURE.

Except we know what MW3 will look like, because it looks the same as MW2.

[J Miliam]

Except we know what MW3 will look like, because it looks the same as MW2.

Made me laugh my titties off.

Exactly. You cannot compare two games by the quality of A PICTURE.

Derp. Footage of a game will look the same as a picture of it, just different scenes. Even if we did compare two gameplay vids, obvious realism is obvious and BF would win.

[IHaxYou!]

The 2nd pic is MW2 not MW3....
And it's not even an in-game screen shot so how could you possibly compare them?

[J Miliam]

Lets remember that the composition of a picture also the mood of it and the different hues, and shades can really make a difference to whether a picture looks good or not.

That doesn't necessarily come into play when the graphics are constants, and the only changing aspect is lighting. That only really comes into play in real live/ live media.

The 2nd pic is MW2 not MW3....
And it's not even an in-game screen shot so how could you possibly compare them?

What's the difference? And even if it wasn't in game, it should look better than it does in game due to it being scripted.

[IHaxYou!]

That doesn't necessarily come into play when the graphics are constants, and the only changing aspect is lighting. That only really comes into play in real live/ live media.



What's the difference? And even if it wasn't in game, it should look better than it does in game due to it being scripted.

Graphics don't really matter to me.
All that matter's is game play and performance.

[Noovaa]

Graphics don't really matter to me.
All that matter's is game play and performance.

Then why the hell do you play Cod?

BF is better in all of those departments.

And the graphics are better, Its a win-win.
[IMG]https://i208.photobucke*****m/albums/bb15/Exodiaj/bf3_mw3_compare.jpg[/IMG]