Manual Method To Change XUID (Or to get UNBANNED)

[shadowx360]

That wouldn't be necessary, as we're writing an anticheat that will kill all hacks. ;p

Haha, haven't you guys been trying to do that for months now? I personally don't think that's even possible unless you go kernel level, which then more often then not leads to frequent BSOD's. This is coming from the guy that got 7 Blue Screens of Death in one morning trying to debug a single damn dll -.-

And eh, remember, the equilibrium between the technology of security and the technology countering security is only ever so slightly imbalanced

[[MPGH]master131]

Kernel level, nah, probably don't have to code a driver/rootkit for an Anti-Cheat. No need to hook API functions when you could easily iterate through a process' module list and check the file paths for them. Most injected DLLs appear as a module so yeah.

[shadowx360]

Kernel level, nah, probably don't have to code a driver/rootkit for an Anti-Cheat. No need to hook API functions when you could easily iterate through a process' module list and check the file paths for them. Most injected DLLs appear as a module so yeah.

Then people can just set random dll names and/or NOP out the function that checks the module list or just re-direct the scan? Though using EnumProcessModules() would be smart in the way that people can't just detour the function with a modded DLL with stubbed out functions. Imagine doing all the stubs for Kernel32.dll. Scary.

[ttdpmg]

Cool story bro

[D.Hunt]

you cant stop coders from making hacks, you can stop these noobs from using em though

a few cheaters isnt so bad but when 90% of the community, including some of your staff (hypocrites, will provide some tasty specs as soon as i get the chance, although i doubt they will be banned), use cheats to look "cool" and "pr0" its just stupid....

i love seeing the 'pr0' players suddenly playing like crap after the new updates
makes that nuke oh so sweeter