Originally Posted by
Empire
His questions are rhetorical are they not? To me, its just like every other debate starting like:
God exist, or else who could have made this earth?
^like that. He really doesn't give a shit about a debate, he's just posting his findings and asking himself a question.
----------------------------------------------------
The thing is, that christianity really doesn't depend on the old testament in truth. They pretty much disregard all laws regarding the old testament, all thats left is stories to show morals and where christianity, ergo christ, originated from.
They are SUPPOSED to follow the old testament as well as the new, but there really is no point because its like "the rules have changed" in the new testament. To be honest, its better they don't, the vibe the old testament has is sooo much worse than the new testament.
----------------
Anyway, the main point is that religion shouldn't be about factual evidence and literal translations. It should be what you take away from the story.
I mean in another 2-4k years, i bet people will question the realism of the holocaust. We might not have the proof then to back it up. Its pointless to speculate and squint so hard at something so long gone. Just take from it what you can.