Last I checked MW3 and BF3 aren't realistic games period.
SO why pick out the little things?
This isn't a military simulator.
FOV Changes don't automagically make a game realistic. Nor do tanks, or having to run across huge maps to kill people.
OH OR SPAWNING ON YOUR TEAMMATES.
Ex Middleman
BF3 is still more realistic than MW3. If you want a military simulator go play ArmA 3.
i don't know why you like bf3 i hate bf series cause the maps fuckin suck! they too big and when you die you have to run freaking long to FUCKIN DIE AGAIN! but i also agree that mw3 is very very bad. it's much worse the mw2. mw2 had good sniping maps. in mw3 there are no sniping maps. and that's why i don't play anything!
Dude, BF3 maps are good. You can spawn on your teammate if you don't wanna run 30 seconds to action place. You can drive, fly, swim, troll good. You can do everything in Battlefield. But in order to have fun, you must get one thing -- you are gonna lose if you want become pro player. Play for fun and have temption to run cross maps. At least, this is not ARMA, where you need really run nearly 15 minutes to get to the point.
The only reason why BF3 is better than MW3 is because in BF3
you can drive and fly shit.
MW3 is the same shit for the past 10 years
just differnt maps thats itu maby a couple
guns here and there.
But MW3 is better if you want real clan matches.
so both games have there pros and cons.
Late 2011 MacBook Pro
Mac OS X Lion
Bootcamp - Windows 7 Professional 32/64 Bit
2.5GHz Quad-core Intel Core i7
750GB Serial ATA Drive @ 7200 rpm
15-inch Hi-Res Antiglare Widescreen Display
ATI Radeon 9800 Pro Mac Edition Video Card
Promise Pegasus 12TB (6x2TB) R6 RAID System
Battlefield 3 is since the last 2 patches more fuc*ed up than before. This f*king Pu*sycopters are killing me all the time -.-
yeah its bored if u suck ass but if u are good itf actually really fun and i like BOTH the games lol