Should there be a new 9/11 investigation?

[radnomguywfq3]

[[MPGH]Austin]

>2012
>suggesting that there should be a new investigation on a "terrorist attack" that has outstanding evidence of a conspiracy suggesting that the government did it
>mfw

[InCognito]

>2012
>suggesting that there should be a new investigation on a "terrorist attack" that has outstanding evidence of a conspiracy suggesting that the government did it
>mfw

>mfw when no face
>yfw when still no face

[[MPGH]Austin]

>mfw when no face
>yfw when still no face

[radnomguywfq3]

>2012
>suggesting that there should be a new investigation on a "terrorist attack" that has outstanding evidence of a conspiracy suggesting that the government did it
>mfw

There are a lot of reasons for a new investigation. Just because it happened 11\12 years ago, doesn't mean it is no longer relavent. Proving corruption and forcing reform, at least out of respect for those who were murdered.

[[MPGH]Austin]

There are a lot of reasons for a new investigation. Just because it happened 11\12 years ago, doesn't mean it is no longer relavent. Proving corruption and forcing reform, at least out of respect for those who were murdered.

Okay let me rephrase

>2012
>suggesting an investigation on a sensitive subject in which has a massive conspiracy surrounding it to yield new information on corruption from the same people that claimed saddam had WMDs to invade foreign lands
>mfw