General
well, warrock and css both have there good sides and bad sides. WArrock has a similar concept as CSS but in warrock u can also go in vehicles and there are bigger maps . CSS however is much more realistic and is built with the source engine so it has better graphics, but it does get boring after a while because all your doing is shooting. But CSS & cs 1.6 have got some cool mods !
Thread: Cs Vs Wr
Results 61 to 64 of 64
-
06-10-2007 #61Leecher
- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- Posts
- 5
- Reputation
10- Thanks
- 0
I think ppl who played wr before css think wr is better and vice versa...
Personnaly, I played wr lots of time before I played css, so think what u want...
-
06-27-2007 #62Dual-Keyboard Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2007
- Gender
- Location
- Posts
- 473
- Reputation
- 12
- Thanks
- 48
[img]https://www.danasof*****m/sig/ghghhkjklk.jpg[/img]
drill sargeant: How tall are you boy!?
soldier: umm....urr about 5' 11''
drill sargeant: I didn't know they stacked shit that high!!
Creator of the Annihilation,Freebie and KFP Series.
<MASTER HACKER>
-
07-08-2007 #63Leecher
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Location
- Posts
- 18
- Reputation
- 10
- Thanks
- 3
Warrock Wins !
WoooW ! man Warrock is 1000x better then Counter Strike! Counter strike is the monkey, warrock is the shootman! ( lol ):
-
07-08-2007 #64Member
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Location
- Posts
- 121
- Reputation
- 9
- Thanks
- 8
WR is much better cause llyke i hate CS.