Originally Posted by
Frost
Yes he can.
Lets just say that you read a book, and I read it.
I read it carefully and thoroughly, while you read it quickly, and interpretate some things wrong.
Then what you say about the book could be taken as a fact, but as I would have read it thoroughly, and interpretate things the right way, then I could indeed prove you wrong.
That is whats going on here. He is proving the religious people who are trying to prove the others wrong, wrong. It is really logic, but to you and me, it sounds like plain bullshit.