Question about bypassing

[Cr0NiX]

Wouldn't it be possible to make pickles bypass undetected by changing some things in the DLL, maybe encrypting it or something and changing the name?

[D3M0L1T10N]

another one of these threads, yup time to make a thread.

edit: making a thread right now

---------- Post added at 06:30 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:46 PM ----------

Check out my thread https://www.mpgh.net/forum/713-garrys...od-update.html tell me if it's any useful.

[IV2B]

another one of these threads, yup time to make a thread.

edit: making a thread right now

---------- Post added at 06:30 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:46 PM ----------

Check out my thread https://www.mpgh.net/forum/713-garrys...od-update.html tell me if it's any useful.

Yes it's useful.
Many less questions should pop out now ^.^

[Cr0NiX]

another one of these threads, yup time to make a thread.

edit: making a thread right now

---------- Post added at 06:30 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:46 PM ----------

Check out my thread https://www.mpgh.net/forum/713-garrys...od-update.html tell me if it's any useful.

That thread didn't answer my question though, I just wanted to know if modifying the dll would decrease the chances of it being detected.

[D3M0L1T10N]

That thread didn't answer my question though, I just wanted to know if modifying the dll would decrease the chances of it being detected.

Probably not, but if your that paranoid you can rename the .dll to My Application and same with the bypasser that's what I did, no idea if it worked.

[Cr0NiX]

Probably not, but if your that paranoid you can rename the .dll to My Application and same with the bypasser that's what I did, no idea if it worked.

Alright, I'll try what you said to do in your thread, at least we'll be banned together if it turns out it is detected <3

[D3M0L1T10N]

Alright, I'll try what you said to do in your thread, at least we'll be banned together if it turns out it is detected <3

lmao i've been *********** on stronghold etc with lots of hacks on, still not banned.

edit: haha wow, that acctualy got censored. rage hacking.

[Cr0NiX]

lmao i've been *********** on stronghold etc with lots of hacks on, still not banned.

edit: haha wow, that acctualy got censored. rage hacking.

lol, i thought you said permabanned.

[IV2B]

That thread didn't answer my question though, I just wanted to know if modifying the dll would decrease the chances of it being detected.

It should help,but probably it won't be any effective.

adding comments inside the code helps avoid detection,also changing the process' name or/and the file's name to something usual on a PC should help.

[wuat]

It should help,but probably it won't be any effective.

adding comments inside the code helps avoid detection,also changing the process' name or/and the file's name to something usual on a PC should help.

lmao no it doesnt the compiler ignores comments, thats why they are comments

[IV2B]

lmao no it doesnt the compiler ignores comments, thats why they are comments

I meant to add stuff that does nothing,like adding a variable wich isn't used.
Also,i'm pretty sure a compiled file without comment is a little different that one with a comment.
I may be wrong but i've tested it with DevC++ while being bored at school.

But HEY...maybe DevC++ just sucks hard...lolol...