Testing Dectection Using Sandboxie

[_NaPaLM_]

I doubt that dayz standalone with allow us to have hacks of the kind we are currently getting in dayz mod. By what I've read, the "network bubble" will prevent the client from even getting info on items outside of a certain radius. bye bye, esp hacks

[Douggem]

ESP will be fine, if you only get information on those 1km around you, 1km ESP is more than enough.

[Woodhouse]

Hey... not all of us are script kiddies. I may be slower than others from another website but still have written my own.

I can count the number of people who can code who have accounts (not who are active) and are in this section on my hand. I am well aware of who you are and that you do as I helped you a while back . But yeah, I see you on the other forums a lot more. So my statement is still pretty accurate. If anything, people just come on here to release stuff or peak around.

[knucklehead1]

__asm Keyword in C/C++

sounds funny, but you do realize that __asm emits raw assembler? all code running on your machine is asm, so obviously the word "detection" fits right in there... NOT.

It uploads all the information on you to the VAC servers -- running processes, actual running code, etc.

wrong. if they simply uploaded raw data (like your private radar .exe) from you to their servers they would quickly have a nice scandal/lawsuit on their hands. why? because apart from this concept going completely against any form of privacy there are a lot of legitimate programs that open a process handle to the game (i.e. look like RPM/WPM hacks).

so all they can do is ban for known/public hack fingerprints / process checksums. i.e. if your (external) hack is private it will never be detected. this has been known for a long time and has been discussed on other sites.

[xCyberxx]

Ooh. Smart idea. if i had a key and private bypass I would try this.

I can try this if u want me to

[eth0]

sounds funny, but you do realize that __asm emits raw assembler? all code running on your machine is asm, so obviously the word "detection" fits right in there... NOT.

Obvious trolling is obvious.

[knucklehead1]

Obvious trolling is obvious.

maybe you think so, but my points are still correct.

[Douggem]

maybe you think so, but my points are still correct.

Except they're not. You know VAC streams suspicious modules and executables back to the master server for analysis, right? It even walks your hard drive. And you explicitly gave them permission to do so when you agreed to their EULA.

[knucklehead1]

You know VAC streams suspicious modules and executables back to the master server for analysis, right? It even walks your hard drive. And you explicitly gave them permission to do so when you agreed to their EULA.

uh, no, I don't "know" that? care to provide some source or is this just another assumption? Note that there is difference between sending a process list and sending an actual executable file. And yes, it walks your harddrive, but that doesn't mean it sends any files - hashes at max.

If you don't believe me just check their code. iirc recently there was a discussion about this topic on another well-known hack forum (I won't mention it here).

sure they could do anything, but that doesn't mean they're actually doing it. If you had used actually private hacks (not those (non)private hacks you can buy anywhere these days) in VAC games you would know. And indeed my own external radars were never detected.


EDIT: check your PMs...

[UltraJosue]

Ooh. Smart idea. if i had a key and private bypass I would try this.

I can try this if u want me to

I would myself. I came up with the idea a little bit too late though. My key was banned before I could test it out. I'd still like to know though.