What do you think about the stigma surrounding the religion of mass shooters?

I hate you.

Republicans are prone to being corrupt, bigots, hypocrites, and racists. This post is an example of your lack of education. There are far more atrocities committed by christians than there are muslims deciding to be jihadists(also take note, the act of jihadism is the most conservative thing you can possibly do. The same with the problems with islam, they're conservative problems). The real people prone to being terrorists are those who hold a traditional ideology of the world. I promise you, if you're liberal enough not religion is going to change your view on the world, just look at all the good christian, muslim, and jews out there. The real good ones who aren't bigots or uphold their religion to the fullest extent. The ones who are willing to engage in an actual debate.

Are you autistic? I don't care about all that. Here I'll make it easier for you.

Conservatism is bad... Being conservative makes bad things happen. wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww

Being a liberal means you're progressive, many people are naturally progressive. It's those who uphold their traditional ideology above progression that cause problems. I can provide so many examples of how conservatism has caused nothing but shit storms, but very rarely what the conservative in the room has to say is on point. 9/10 times conservatives are just idiots, as expected.

"Traditions are an idiot thing" - Rick

- - - Updated - - -

Conservative!

If that were true there would be no democratic establishment right now, nor would there be a republican party. (The republican party was originally liberal)

Higher taxes on the rich, tax the rich instead of taxing everybody on things like parking. There are a lot of problems caused by the rich, and we as the majority have been paying off the rich's debts for a long time. They've nearly collapsed the economy multiple times, and have been cutting their own taxes for decades.

This isn't about being cucked by the government, it's about taking control of our country. In plato's republic he acknowledges the masses are plebs and do not have the wisdom required to make sound judgement in certain cases (talking about democracy) and proposes something known as a plutonomy (google that). Plato strongly believed only the wisest and most powerful are fit to lead, and I believe it too. The only problem is wealth is what gives people power and "wisdom", and you can't have people leading with their own interests above the peoples.

But hillary earned her money the same way trump did. Through "the art of the deal", the only difference is she actually worked her ass off, while trump easily made tons of money due to his gimmick and already having 2 million dollars to start off with. Hillary worked to get where she was the same way many of us do, Trump just relied on other people and the government to help him. Sure he worked for his money, but not nearly as hard as Hillary.

I think you're upset about hillary having 42 million dollars or so for her campaign while trump couldn't even get 1 million and got turned down by the koch brothers...