[Support]Simplex

PollSupport ?
Yes91% · 21
No9% · 2
23 votes · poll closed
Posts 115 of 73 · Page 1 of 5
[Support]Simplex
Sup Guys,

As most of you know that I am developing a scripting language called "Simplex". At first, it was just for fun with childish syntax but after sometime I changed my mind and now I am going to develop it properly. The compiler has evolved a lot (basically that's what I was doing for 1 whole year). I kept on experimenting with compiler and developed somewhat cool mini language. For serious development, I definitely need the help of you guys. So, I asked Dave for a separate section and he wanted me to make a thread and see if there is enough promise. Basically I need you to support its development by suggestions on syntax, compiler, functionality, IDE, etc, etc. If you can code in VB.net and C#, you are more than welcome to code for it too. There is quite good amount of people on YouTube who are ready for helping its development, so it would be good if they can participate on single place.

If you are willing to help, kindly show your support in this thread. Here is the latest IDE, just so you know this stuff is real:

You know I support it , looks good. Cant wait to play with it.
Whats your plan on releases?
nice, I can't help you with coding but I can suggest you the following things:
-Add a ASM support like on C++, it will be bery helpful for hacking, and even more.
Err, nothing more, if smth comes in mah head I'm gonna share.
Anyways I really liked this thingy from the first day that I saw ure vid. on youtube.
Keep this amazing shizzle up!
Ofc I support you, I wouldn't mind helping out if you need help and seeing what can be done with it
Haven't coded in ages, might help :P

Either way I strongly support this >
I support, I want it.....
One question.

What did you code the compiler with
ISupport
Looks very good, great job. Release should be nice
With .Net you can just compile C# code on the fly that runs equally as a fast as the code which compiled it, compile times for .Net are incredibly fast as well (because it only has to compile to CLI.) The .Net framework virtually ships with a scripting engine - at least reflection makes it seem like such. That's one of the reasons it's so powerful.

So while I encourage what you're doing, I would do it w\ a language that doesn't rely on a framework that carries around a compiler where-ever it goes (if you aren't already.)

Another idea is to write it so that it supports the compact .net framework, because that framework doesn't support reflection as well or on the fly compiling.

But for my engine, I have a 'scripts' precompiled to assemblies. So that it would be compiled directly into CLI - so runtime analysis & compilation wasn't required.

OYea, and are you aware that herpes is caused by the herpes simplex virus? xD
/Support lol
Do not want. Slothboi won't finish this for another 50 decades.






jk, you know i support you mjpedoloverwhotakesdickinhisassboi
Posts 115 of 73 · Page 1 of 5

Post a Reply

Tags for this Thread

Need help?