Combat arms!
Then both!
America army
they both suck ass.
lol your just saying that cause either A. you have never tried AA and or AA3 and are just going off of what everyone else says or B. like most of the people here probably that just plain out suck in FPS Strategy games, and just die off within the first 2 mins of game play and dont wanna watch everyone else so you just assume cause theres no DM where you just re spawn back up right after you die so you think the game sucks.
suseke16 (07-19-2009)
This thread is kinda hopeless, most people play ca, and those who are goin "CA IS WAY BETTER" havnt done any research..Ca is about as realistic as Harry the Popper, while all weapons in AA3 have to be approved by the actual armed forces of america. Combat arms is ridiculous, snipers don't shoot according to the cross hair when you are moving, which is complete BS, and any game would own combat arms based alone on the fact that nexon is running it.
OMG "X_GPS_X GOT UNBANNED? NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Combat Arms is better
ok... id like to try this AA but until ive tryed it CA all the way. also not everyone hacks in CA dont say that whoever did. I mean alot of ppl hack in it but not enough to be "EVERYONE."
well,
Combat arms still has alot of bugs like pp thad won't die etc..., you also can't crawl etc.
America's arm on the other hand has not so many bugs, but i find it is a little to "stiff" they could make their game some more user friendly etc also it's verry realistic.
gr33tz fyver
WOW, until u actually have first hand experience with the graphics of aa3, don't make judgmental comments. AA3's graphics can be compared almost be compared with Cod4, while CA's graphics are worse than vice city's graphics. You still haven't made a valid point to prove CA is better in any way.
CA PLAWKS never playen aa :\
CA would be better if it wasnt full of 8 year old kids crying when someone kills them :|
this is a gay vote, ca sucks and aa is a game that just dont capture the theme of itself...