Of course a sand ****** would do a revenge shooting against white kids
Honestly violence will probably be the last thing to be eradicated
I see that these are cases where someone was wrongfully convicted and unfortunately executed off a wrongful conviction. Do you believe that people should still be executed if they're guilty without a doubt or do you believe that there is always a chance of someone being innocent despite how much evidence (assuming the evidence is solid evidence) there is (this question is independent of the cases you linked)?
Rep. Power: 126
Minion: 11/28/12-3/15/14
Of course a sand ****** would do a revenge shooting against white kids
Honestly violence will probably be the last thing to be eradicated
The problem is that being convicted *should* be 'guilty without a doubt', but historically it routinely hasn't.
Check out both The Innocence Project
and the National Registry of Exonerations
The National Registry is especially interesting because if you click on the name it has a full rundown of the case.
These are just the exonerations too, there are most likely tens of thousands to hundreds of thousands of innocent people sitting in prison right now that have been either denied appeals, or haven't gotten the help they desperately need to prove their innocence. Our justice system is severely broken, and killing people doesn't solve anything. Besides, the point of the justice system is to prevent crime is it not? Then why is ours so bent on revenge and not rehabilitation? No wonder the US has the highest recidivism rate in the developed world, when you treat people like caged animals they tend to act like them.
Last edited by Aborted; 03-19-2019 at 12:53 PM.
You were seeking strength, justice, splendour.
You were seeking love.
Here is the pit, here is your pit.
Its name is Silence..
I know a dude who knows him, he was having a beef with his girlfriend so he decided to kill her.
[IMG]https://cdn129.picsar*****m/215837188000202.gif?r240x240[/IMG]