More climate "science" junk

So there's this new paper that claimed that human activity caused Global Warming to accelerate 170x the natural rate.

Here's the "brilliant" model they came up with:

This is the bullshit garbage in climate "science" I've been talking about. They come up with garbage nonsense to reach the predetermined conclusions that can get them more funding.
They essentially "assumed" that the change in the environment for the past 50 years is ENTIRELY from human activity. Nothing else.

The sad part is that pseudo-intellectual Liberals like Dave and Arun will fall for it.

My brain hurts

Lol "lets write complicated shit, no one will say we are wrong".

You have started this topic just to talk shit on dave and arun behind their backs.

Mhm, you seem to be a mature one.

Originally Posted by Mayion

You have started this topic just to talk shit on dave and arun behind their backs.

Mhm, you seem to be a mature one.

Well OP probably knows he can't talk shit to their face, so goes for the next option.

I said option, not a good option.

fuck off Hyperion ur gay

Inb4 Brain Lag

Please, just stop. This is starting to become beyond ridiculous.

do u even calculus bro

Isn't this wat you were in your last thread?

Why make a new one potato?????

Originally Posted by Dave84311

Isn't this wat you were in your last thread?

Why make a new one potato?????

u better show him some respect u pseudo-intellectual Liberal

Cheers for pointing that out to me, let me just forget all the scientific evidence they've "assumed" up.

I don't think you really understand how science works though, scientists are always trying to prove a theory wrong - not right. The theory that human activity has increased global warming hasn't been disproved hence it's the accepted scientific theory. It's basically as close to fact as you can get, unless there's some tangible evidence that human activity is NOT to blame then the theory still stands.

i HAVE NO IDEA ON THE TOPIC OF THIS IDEA

What's with conservatives and conspiracy theories?

It's like they can't deal with reality so they make shit up and connect dots that don't even exist to cope.

Derive a formula to represent climate change based on scientific data for the last 40-50 years > must be used to get financial funding. Brilliant!

More climate "science" junk

Post a Reply

Similar Threads

Tags for this Thread