President Hillary Vice President Obama Anyone?

Posts 1–15 of 31 · Page 1 of 3

this could be an outcome Hillary as president Obama as vice president
or Obama as president and Hillary as vice president?

Does anyone agree?

I'm for Obama for president

Originally Posted by dachoob33

I'm for Obama for president

lol the racist guy wants a black dude for president!

Originally Posted by <sniper>

this could be an outcome Hillary as president Obama as vice president
or Obama as president and Hillary as vice president?

Does anyone agree?

I personally think they don't have the chemistry to make that work.

I think that obama will be president and hillary would be vp.

That way, they break 4 records at once.

1st black man in office, 1st woman in office, 1st female VP, 1st black president

If Hillary wins America becomes two-faced. If Obama wins we become hipocrits... Hillary changes her principles based on the Media's Bullshit Polls; Obama doesn't even salute our nations Flag nor will he follow the swearing-in procedure as said in the Constitution. America may be ready for a black, or woman, president, and wanting a democrat thinking they'll fix Bush's mistakes...But that doesn't mean the Delegates are ready for it (They are who will matter the People only get to narrow it down). Government Class Education for the win.

They also say Mccain is one of the most Liberal Republican's yet. If only a few Democrats vote his way he'll win presidency anyway. And we'll be fine. Sure we won't abandon our sacrificed lives and the innocent people in the middle-east if we vote Mccain.(Didn't know that was a bad thing?...) But all the other issues will be handled just as well by him as any of the Democrats. Granted i agree with Democrat's economics more, they will cost us more taxes to achieve those goals. Ben Bernke will ensure that fact ;p

I'm more opposed to property tax then i am the war. I now await for people who oppose the War regardless of FAQs to start bitching me out even though that was an off-topic example : ( BRING IT ON

Originally Posted by <sniper>

this could be an outcome Hillary as president Obama as vice president
or Obama as president and Hillary as vice president?

Does anyone agree?

Super delegates have no control over the election. All they can do is tip it in favor, the only reason this MOST likely will come down to it, is because Obama is a great challenger, and Hillary can't take the heat. Thanks to him, the race is unusually neck and neck. I'd love to see sources on your Obama claims.

Second of all, MANY republicans hate McCain and would rather have a democrat then him. This has been an issue on the news and such since McCain emerged as undisputed front runner. Ben Bernanke HAS no control over taxes, so he can't "ensure" anything. All he can do is set the federal reserve ratio, and that ends up setting the interest rates.

Yeah, PROPERTY TAX is sooooooooo bad, it might stimulate the economy in the country, but HOORAY for WAR, WE CAN SPEND 2 Trillion to GO IN DEBT, AND SPEND a large percent of our money on FOREIGN AFFAIRS, thus causing devaluation of the dollar versus the world wide economy. We can go attack a country for "WMDs" that never existed, but hey, who the fuck are we not? WERE AMERICA, we can go fuck your country over for no reason.

Sorry i explained it wrong, i simply was mentioning the fact, the PEOPLE only chose the final two candidates, the GOVERNMENT choses the final winner of Pesidency.

Secondly, CONSERVATIVE's IN OFFICE hate McCain for being more democratic then most republicans. Direct news quote i believe.

Property tax is the government charging us to have homes, on 'their land' when it's ours, nothing more. No one likes where the War went but where it started had majority support.

Hillary changes her oppinions based on stagable Polls, constantly. Stays with a cheating husband for political benefits. And spends more time insulting others then building herself. Two-faced.

Obama refuses to follow Constitutional procedure for swearing in as President, turns his back to our flag during pledges, and won't put his hand over his heart. Hipocritical.

McCain offers all of their plans, without the Socialism and Increased Taxation, yet simply wishes not to abandon our soldier's given lives, hopes, and the innocent middle-easterner's.

Also history has shown us you're a pathetic Military Leader if you believe in Time Tables.

Originally Posted by Toymaker

The government has NO control over the government, thats the most stupid shit you could say. Then the ruling party would ALWAYS win and Obama and Clinton wouldn't be wasting their time campaigning, last time I checked they were part of the government.

Conservatives not support McCain has NOTHING to do with Liberals voting McCain, hence why I said Conservatives will cross bounds and vote for the democrat, especially Obama.

What you stated about property tax, OK? The "majority" was wrong, does it make it right?

I agree Hillary is two faced. Can't blame her.

And again, reiterating your statements about Obama is not linking to sources.

Right, McCain can do all that, fund health care, support college students, fight the war, pay the bills, and not kill our economy, WITHOUT RAISING TAXES. Pigs can fly also. So people died fighting a faux-war? How about the 400k innocent Iraqis who died as casualty of war? Yes, staying longer in Iraq will please the extremists, and admitting failure is so much more worth the lives of innocent people? Will winning a fake war please the lives of the dead soldiers? Or perhaps would they wan't no more to die for a false cause. Yeah, that makes more sense.

Yeah, schedules make you a bad military leader. Right, even though that has NOTHING to do with the discussion.

Oh god it's sf0d all over again

No offense but you don't know how presidents are elected is the problem sir lol :P Straight fact. Electoral College not popular vote decides the final.

1. People narrow canditates down to 1 democrat and 1 republic.

2. The State reps (government - electroal college) vote on the final canditate. The winner of popular vote in the secondary does not win the presidency.

Constitutional fact, you can't argue if you read it, google.com may help. The founding fathers didn't trust the people alone to speaches.

- - -

And about War. You heard the fact less people died in the ENTIRE War then have died in Pensylvania in CAR ACCIDENTS last year? Anywho, the majority IS America. So it IS right for us. And Iraq alone is wrong and unsupported, BUT all we did is free people, big deal. Also 98% of the soliders WANT to fight. Only like five people bitched on the news and were probably offered the publicity for it. Selling out their loyalty.

And time tables aren't off-topic if they're about the war we both commented

Enough with the random bullshit arguments that hold no water to try and destroy credibility, crytical. It's so goddamn childish.

Originally Posted by arunforce

Beginning to see the light? OH WAIT, OH WAIT! I THOUGHT OBAMA COULDNT WIN! "The media SETS everything and Clinton will win no matter what." I told you, you were full of shit. Just like all your conspiracy theory bullshit. You can't speak worth shit about politics now, just like I said would happen.

Super delegates have no control over the election. All they can do is tip it in favor, the only reason this MOST likely will come down to it, is because Obama is a great challenger, and Hillary can't take the heat. Thanks to him, the race is unusually neck and neck. I'd love to see sources on your Obama claims.

Second of all, MANY republicans hate McCain and would rather have a democrat then him. This has been an issue on the news and such since McCain emerged as undisputed front runner. Ben Bernanke HAS no control over taxes, so he can't "ensure" anything. All he can do is set the federal reserve ratio, and that ends up setting the interest rates.

Yeah, PROPERTY TAX is sooooooooo bad, it might stimulate the economy in the country, but HOORAY for WAR, WE CAN SPEND 2 Trillion to GO IN DEBT, AND SPEND a large percent of our money on FOREIGN AFFAIRS, thus causing devaluation of the dollar versus the world wide economy. We can go attack a country for "WMDs" that never existed, but hey, who the fuck are we not? WERE AMERICA, we can go fuck your country over for no reason.

Wait Wait I was just saying that these people could be partnered up but I still Believe Hilary Will Be pres. Our government is full of bullshit and we take in a very big part of that bullshit

I mean Come on If any of you believe that 9/11 was done by the government
You seriously think that changing its leader will change that mass murder committed by the same people

There Will Be another "Terrorist Attack" After He or She is Elected And the government will make up another lie That some shit like arab "cavemen" did it. The is stupidity even after 9/11 when another attack will happen people will still kiss the media's ass

LOL ACE dude it has nothing to do with credibility but if you don't think im correct or supported? READ THE CONSTITUTION LOL. Very straight foward and you're calling bullshit on me dude? That's not even immature that's just uneducated. Calm down plz -.'- Get a constitution -.'- "Oh wierd that is true, ty Crytical" Anytime i disagree with you im childish -.'- wtf. yet it's documented white and black unchanged solotirary fact since 1776.

I can narrow my entire post down to one sentence to prove im right dude Get a copy of the US constitution

Originally Posted by Toymaker

First of all the people narrow it down to as MANY candidates as they want, the number of parties represents how many candidates are in the final election for that party. Most just don't have enough support to be even considered an "opponent." Popular Vote decides which electors (which isn't always the government) go to vote for the candidate FOR that state. Usually they are bounded by contract to vote for the candidate, but if they don't they become a faithless elector. Electors are important because the government would have to represent the counting of all votes, and corruption could easily be installed to win a election.

People died in car crashes? IMAGINE THAT! Should we have a war on cars now? It's right for us? Yeah, that's new to me. When our economy gets ruined because some idiots find it right to goto war and kill innocent people, that's RIGHT for us. We freed them? Yeah, that's why the majority of Iraqis find it WORSE now then it was when Saddam reigned, oh I'm so sorry to ruin your bullshit party, at least they were still alive then. 98% of the soldiers want to fight? AHAHAH, yeah, THATS SO FUNNY. Your so full bullshit. I bet you can't provide facts for that either, oh just like the Obama smearing bullshit. You use War so lightly, throw it around like it's a tool to be used. But if you were in their shoes, you would be crying. War should never be used as a tool of instrumentation of policy, it just sheds the lights on the cynicism and barbarianism of humanity. The fact is, we invaded Iraq to find WMDs, never to go saving the people, else we would of done it a long time ago, and never installed Saddam in power. You bullshitters just use it now because you believed that bullshit, but when it turned out to be false, it just so happened that you felt the need to lie more to cover what "credibility" you had. It's so funny you accused them of being disloyal? Yeah, obviously those hundreds of soldiers who lost body limbs must still want to fight and are all neo-con nut jobs.

Do you even know what a time table is?