Why the theory of evolution fails

Thousands of further stages are needed in order to progress from a protein to a cell. Above all, any protein
that happens to form by claim that the cell came into being by chance is as illogical as claiming that all the buildings,
roads, transport systems, water and electricity in New York City emerged thanks to the effects
of random natural phenomena such as storms and earthquakes.

Thanks but i'm just a regular person like anyone else.

I am someone who seeks for knowledge.
I just read and read, the more interesting it is the better it sticks to my brains.

Oh yeah and the evolutionists claim that the transition from one species to another takes place from the simple to the more complex and in stages.

That means that transitional forms must have existed during the progress from one species to another. Jet, there is still not the slightest trace of such intermediate forms. Like half-fish or half-bird forms.

The only thing that i don't understand is why they continue to believe in this theory.

The big Bang cause life to evolve from beneath the sea, thus a cell emerging from the bottom of the ocrean that was formed by the big bang, walking on land, becoming a dinosaur, eating naked cavemen, being george washington (Ape first obviously)
Then becoming obama, aka a cell that was left outside to long.

Herp derp, I're Bombs and I're trolls debayte sec-shun.

http://www.biosci.utexas.edu/ib/facu...0evolution.pdf

Coeus, i would appreciate it if you could give a short description as i don't have the time to read all of that.
---

So evolutionists say that random genetic changes can cause living things to evolve. But the fact is, that mutations are always harmful to living things, they do not develop them, and can never endow them with any new functional features.

To claim that mutations improve species and endow it with new advantages is like claiming that striking a computer with a hammer will result in a more advanced model.

Your lack of knowledge is disturbing. Who said mutations are always harmful?

What are you doing in the debate section if you find it disturbing? Almost all posts are based on what mpgh users believe or think.


Mutations either kill or deform the afflicted organism.
No mutation has ever been observed to increase genetic information.

Mutation - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Read that and come back again, you seem to have skipped too many Biology classes. (note: #Beneficial_mutations)

It all came by coincidence. Don't you get it?


So, if a complex structure came into existence all of a sudden, what does this mean?

So for example, let us resemble the cell to a high-tech car
in terms of its complexity. (In fact, the cell is comprised of a much more complex and
developed system than a car with its motor and all its technical equipment.) So what would you think if you went out trekking in the depths of a thick forest and ran across a latest model car among the trees?

Would you think that various elements in the forest had come together by chance over millions of years and produced such a vehicle?

All the raw materials making up the car are obtained from iron, plastic, rubber, earth
or its by-products, but would this fact lead you to think that these materials had synthesized "by chance" and then come together and manufactured such a car?

Without doubt, anyone with a sound mind would know that the car was the product
of a conscious design, that is a factory, and wonder what it was doing there in the
middle of a jungle. The sudden origination of a complex structure in a complete form out
of the blue shows that it is created by a conscious agent. A complex system like the cell is no doubt created by a superior will and wisdom. In other words, it came into existence as a creation of God.