Skip to content
MPGHThe Dark Arts
/
RegisterLog in
Forum
Community
What's NewLatest posts across the boardTrendingHottest threads right nowSubscribedThreads you follow
Discussion
GeneralIntroductionsEntertainmentDebate FortFlaming & Rage
Board
News & AnnouncementsMPGH TimesSuggestions & HelpGiveaways
More Sections
Art & Graphic DesignProgrammingHackingCryptocurrency
Hacks & Cheats
Games
ValorantCS2 / CS:GOCall of Duty / WarzoneFortniteApex LegendsEscape From Tarkov
+14 moreLeague of LegendsGTA VMinecraftRustROTMGBattlefieldTroveBattleOnCombat ArmsCrossFireBlackshotRuneScapeDayZDead by Daylight
Resources
Game Hacking TutorialsReverse EngineeringGeneral Game HackingAnti-CheatConsole Game Hacking
Tools
Game Hacking ToolsTrainers & CheatsHack/Release NewsNew
Submit a release →Share your cheat, tool, or config with the community.
AINEW
AI Tools
General & DiscussionPrompt EngineeringLLM JailbreaksHotAI Agents & AutomationLocal / Open Models
AI × Gaming
AI Aimbots & VisionML Anti-CheatGame Bots & Automation
Create
AI Coding / Vibe CodingAI Art & MediaAI Voice & TTS
The AI frontier →Where game hacking meets modern machine learning. Jump in.
Marketplace
Buy & Sell
SellingBuyingTradingUser Services
Trust & Safety
Middleman LoungeMarketplace TalkVouch Copy Profiles
Money
Cryptocurrency TalkCurrency ExchangeWork & Job Offers
Start selling →List accounts, services, and goods. Use the middleman to trade safe.
MPGH The Dark Arts

A community for offensive security research, reverse engineering, and AI.

Community

ForumMarketplaceSearch

Account

RegisterLog in

Legal

Privacy PolicyForum RulesHelp & FAQ
© 2026 MPGH · All rights reserved.Built by the community, for the community. For educational purposes onlyContent is shared for security research and education — we don't condone illegal use. You're responsible for complying with applicable laws. Use at your own risk.
Home › Forum › Main › General › Debate Fort › Why the theory of evolution fails

Why the theory of evolution fails

Posts 1–15 of 329 · Page 1 of 22
…
Bombsaway707
Bombsaway707
Why the theory of evolution fails
Cell theory - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

  1. All living organisms are made up of one or more cells.
  2. Cells are the basic unit of life.
  3. All cells arise from pre-existing cells.
  4. The cell is the unit of structure, physiology, and organization in living things.
  5. The cell retains a dual existence as a distinct entity and a building block in the construction of organisms.

Where did the first cell come from then?
Derp.
Thus, science contradicts itself.
Anyone care to debate me?
#1 · 15y ago
LI
lies'
Quote Originally Posted by Bombsaway707 View Post
Where did the first cell come from then?

The first cell came somehow be coincidence. That's what evolutionists say.
#2 · 15y ago
Bombsaway707
Bombsaway707
Quote Originally Posted by lies' View Post
The first cell came somehow be coincidence. That's what evolutionists say.
They say it came from a bunch of chemicals mixing together, yet the cell theory contradicts that statement
#3 · 15y ago
LI
lies'
Thousands of further stages are needed in order to progress from a protein to a cell. Above all, any protein
that happens to form by claim that the cell came into being by chance is as illogical as claiming that all the buildings,
roads, transport systems, water and electricity in New York City emerged thanks to the effects
of random natural phenomena such as storms and earthquakes.
#4 · edited 15y ago · 15y ago
Bombsaway707
Bombsaway707
Quote Originally Posted by lies' View Post
Thousands of further stages are needed in order to progress from a protein to a cell. Above all, any protein
that happens to form by claim that the cell came into being by chance is as illogical as claiming that all the buildings,
roads, transport systems, water and electricity in New York City emerged thanks to the effects
of random natural phenomena such as storms and earthquakes.
You are a smart man
#5 · 15y ago
LI
lies'
Thanks but i'm just a regular person like anyone else.

I am someone who seeks for knowledge.
I just read and read, the more interesting it is the better it sticks to my brains.

Oh yeah and the evolutionists claim that the transition from one species to another takes place from the simple to the more complex and in stages.

That means that transitional forms must have existed during the progress from one species to another. Jet, there is still not the slightest trace of such intermediate forms. Like half-fish or half-bird forms.

The only thing that i don't understand is why they continue to believe in this theory.
#6 · 15y ago
Bombsaway707
Bombsaway707
Quote Originally Posted by lies' View Post
Thanks but i'm just a regular person like anyone else.

I am someone who seeks for knowledge.
I just read and read, the more interesting it is the better it sticks to my brains.

Oh yeah and the evolutionists claim that the transition from one species to another takes place from the simple to the more complex and in stages.

That means that transitional forms must have existed during the progress from one species to another. Jet, there is still not the slightest trace of such intermediate forms. Like half-fish or half-bird forms.

The only thing that i don't understand is why they continue to believe in this theory.
Its simply because they refuse to believe the truth. They can't accept the fact that a superior being exists and thus they believe a crazy scientific "truth". To me believing God exists is easier to believe then the big bang theory
#7 · 15y ago
Spartanlol
Spartanlol
The big Bang cause life to evolve from beneath the sea, thus a cell emerging from the bottom of the ocrean that was formed by the big bang, walking on land, becoming a dinosaur, eating naked cavemen, being george washington (Ape first obviously)
Then becoming obama, aka a cell that was left outside to long.
#8 · 15y ago
Alen
Alen


Herp derp, I're Bombs and I're trolls debayte sec-shun.

http://www.biosci.utexas.edu/ib/facu...0evolution.pdf
#9 · 15y ago
Infamous
Infamous
agreed this thread is a box of cocks
#10 · 15y ago
LI
lies'
Coeus, i would appreciate it if you could give a short description as i don't have the time to read all of that.
---

So evolutionists say that random genetic changes can cause living things to evolve. But the fact is, that mutations are always harmful to living things, they do not develop them, and can never endow them with any new functional features.

To claim that mutations improve species and endow it with new advantages is like claiming that striking a computer with a hammer will result in a more advanced model.
#11 · 15y ago
Alen
Alen
Quote Originally Posted by lies' View Post
Coeus, i would appreciate it if you could give a short description as i don't have the time to read all of that.
---

So evolutionists say that random genetic changes can cause living things to evolve. But the fact is, that mutations are always harmful to living things, they do not develop them, and can never endow them with any new functional features.

To claim that mutations improve species and endow it with new advantages is like claiming that striking a computer with a hammer will result in a more advanced model.
Your lack of knowledge is disturbing. Who said mutations are always harmful?
#12 · 15y ago
LI
lies'
Quote Originally Posted by Coeus View Post
Your lack of knowledge is disturbing. Who said mutations are always harmful?
What are you doing in the debate section if you find it disturbing? Almost all posts are based on what mpgh users believe or think.


Mutations either kill or deform the afflicted organism.
No mutation has ever been observed to increase genetic information.
#13 · 15y ago
Alen
Alen
Quote Originally Posted by lies' View Post
What are you doing in the debate section if you find it disturbing? Almost all posts are based on what mpgh users believe or think.


Mutations either kill or deform the afflicted organism.
No mutation has ever been observed to increase genetic information.
Mutation - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Read that and come back again, you seem to have skipped too many Biology classes. (note: #Beneficial_mutations)
#14 · 15y ago
LI
lies'
It all came by coincidence. Don't you get it?


So, if a complex structure came into existence all of a sudden, what does this mean?

So for example, let us resemble the cell to a high-tech car
in terms of its complexity. (In fact, the cell is comprised of a much more complex and
developed system than a car with its motor and all its technical equipment.) So what would you think if you went out trekking in the depths of a thick forest and ran across a latest model car among the trees?

Would you think that various elements in the forest had come together by chance over millions of years and produced such a vehicle?

All the raw materials making up the car are obtained from iron, plastic, rubber, earth
or its by-products, but would this fact lead you to think that these materials had synthesized "by chance" and then come together and manufactured such a car?

Without doubt, anyone with a sound mind would know that the car was the product
of a conscious design, that is a factory, and wonder what it was doing there in the
middle of a jungle. The sudden origination of a complex structure in a complete form out
of the blue shows that it is created by a conscious agent. A complex system like the cell is no doubt created by a superior will and wisdom. In other words, it came into existence as a creation of God.
#15 · 15y ago
Posts 1–15 of 329 · Page 1 of 22
…

Post a Reply

Tags for this Thread

None