Fuck SAMP, get MTA

yes . . GTA is the best . . :P

What is wrong with fucking ******s saying something sucks that you have never tried before? I bet more people are going to post saying MTA sucks because they heard others saying it sucks. Just fucking try it out dickheads.

What's wrong to you guys? If you say SA:MP is better than MTA, you're lying. Funny thing is: No-one here seems to know the word 'arguments'. If one of them is better, give your reasons. Without reasons, no opinion.

Personally, I like MTA way way more. Reasons:

• MTA is creating infinity. It has so much possibilities, you can hardly think about something which is not possible in MTA.
• Clientside scripts: That's why MTA's sync is so good. The server only does stuff which just NEEDS to be synced, the client does the rest.
• Stuff usable for other parties; like the Ingame Handling Editor I'm developing, allows users to import and export handling.cfg (so singleplayer) lines too.
• Objects, players, vehicles, markers and whatever are elements. Makes it easier to script between them.
• LUA, which is a language I like the most of any language I know. Yes, ofcourse this depends on the user, but I just love the flexibleness of LUA <3
• So much more :P

All I hear from SA:MP users is that "MTA sucks" or "shittier servers, fuck mta gtfo outa this section". That are no reasons, that's just raging because you can't handle the truth.
Luckily I've heard a few SA:MP users why they prefer SA:MP over MTA. Here's a list of reasons they gave:

• It has a nicer chatbox. - Oh, I have to agree with that partially. The scrollbar of SA:MP looks ugly, just as the textinput is, but indeed, I like the text itself more than MTA's one. Now, I'm gonna tell you something funny. MTA has DirectX functions, allowing to draw images and even change their color. So, scripting a new chatbox in MTA? No problem.
• SA:MP has more players. - That's a fact. You want to know why? Because of the namechoose. Google for San Andreas Multiplayer, and you will get SA:MP ofcourse. Reason why SA:MP keeps having more players? Because of this argument. If everyone moves, MTA has more players, so this argument is invalid.
• I don't need so much functions, SA:MP has enough imo. - Are you dumb? You dont HAVE to use the functions MTA has -_-

Please tell me if you have some arguments why SA:MP could be better. I'm able to reject them.

By the way, 90% of the SA:MP server uses the Map Editor of MTA. Not really fair to say MTA sux then, because SA:MP isn't capable to have a better one. Don't use the Map Editor if you think it sucks...

Oh, and Kye is a dictator, nuff said.

And here you two go again. LEARN 2 ARGUE -_-
If SA:MP is better than MTA, give us atleast one reason. No reason, no opinion. If you don't know any reasons, but still saying SA:MP is better, then gtfo and stfu, you just can't handle the truth then.

I both like SA:MP and MTA, but I dare say that MTA is much better. People from SA:MP just say MTA sucks for no reason or perhaps only one single reason : 'SA:MP has a larger playerbase.' which is not that true because most of the people are porting over to MTA.