blu-ray sux

Polltell me your opinion on blu-ray and the new I7 cores.
35 votes · pick one or more
Posts 1–15 of 19 · Page 1 of 2
blu-ray sux
i was just looking at the best/worst technology of 2008 and blu-ray was on the top of the worst technology which is where is deserves to be its slow and cost so much money in the first place its like 150+ for a blu-ray player and the picture is really close to an HD DVD (yes i have seen both). but i am happy to see that the new I7 quad cores are on the best list =)


edit: i fucked up my poll just only choose 2 answers -.-
lolz
woldnt know can't afford it anyways...... but nice to know i wont be buying it either
yeah my friend has a blu-ray and when i go over there we watch movies on it takes so long to read load and such the disc speed on them is only about 2X so slow and the picture is so close to a HD DVD
Quote Originally Posted by grekx View Post
yeah my friend has a blu-ray and when i go over there we watch movies on it takes so long to read load and such the disc speed on them is only about 2X so slow and the picture is so close to a HD DVD
Repeat ourselves much?
dey but expansive. A two-layer Blu-ray Disc can store 50 gigabytes, almost six times the capacity of a two-layer DVD, or ten and a half times that of a single-layer DVD.
yeha i know they can hold a shit load of info but there not that great and whats the point of all that info if you cant use it if you want it on the comp you need the drive which is 150 dollars
i got a blu-ray and a hd-dvd player they do look a like but the only diffrents is the hd-dvd player was interactive and they dont make hd-dvd players the price for the dvds are crazy 30 $ for a movie so i just bought a shit load of blank blu-ray disks so i can make my own movies its cheaper but illigal at the same time lol
lol well that works and its illegal double bonus
Blue Ray fails too much money for next to no difference.
I personally do like Blu-Ray and i think it was a good move on Sony´s Part.....
Blu ray is way overrated, but good
Meh, I don't see the difference.
that my point why pay 200 dollars more for something thats the same i think it was a bad move by sony
YA it is WAAAAAAAAAAY overrated and not many movies for it only the good ones... Or so people think...
Posts 1–15 of 19 · Page 1 of 2

Post a Reply

Similar Threads

Tags for this Thread

Talk with us