Really that bad?

I have been posting on a few topics and people are saying I wont be able to run BF3. Is this true? I would like to clarify it.

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

On ultra or high probably not but you computer shuld run the game just fine at medium to low setings.

I seriously doubt he could play lag free on medium with that ancient graphics card.

agreed
that video card is WAAAAY to old and bf3 requires a quad-core processor

Originally Posted by Joebob97

agreed
that video card is WAAAAY to old and bf3 requires a quad-core processor

does it really?

Originally Posted by Fogest

does it really?

Require? Probably not. Specs aren't even released yet, but what they have said is if you can run BFBC2 you will at least be able to run BF3, even if it's only on the lowest settings.

Originally Posted by Tick Me On

Require? Probably not. Specs aren't even released yet, but what they have said is if you can run BFBC2 you will at least be able to run BF3, even if it's only on the lowest settings.

Yeah I don't think there is any game that would require a quad core. A lot of dual cores are sometimes as good as Quad cores.

Off topic : lol at your sig

Still in denial?

If you can run bfbc2 on highest with no lag you should be able to run Bf3 on medium with no lag.

Originally Posted by Noovaa

If you can run bfbc2 on highest with no lag you should be able to run Bf3 on medium with no lag.

I run bfbc2 atm on lowest graphics will still a little lag in some spots, not a lot.

Originally Posted by Moshos1

I run bfbc2 atm on lowest graphics will still a little lag in some spots, not a lot.

Than probably you won't be able to play it.

Originally Posted by Moshos1

I run bfbc2 atm on lowest graphics will still a little lag in some spots, not a lot.

There's a chance you'll be able to play BF3 on the same settings you play BC2 on.

From what I've heard, the optimization this time around is much better, so the game won't be making super computers suck its' dick...which is currently what it seems like.